From: James Semmel on
TO: All melanoma researchers, doctors, and patients.

Some are touting practically every disease under the sun--even the
common cold--as being a vitamin D deficiency. Such one-pill wonders
raise a red flag.

Those selling vitamin D as a cure-all for humanity's ills have a lot
of explaining to do. First and foremost, they will need to explain
why those diseases do not afflict a baby in the womb, who is just as
susceptible to periods of vitamin D depletion as the mother. They
will then need to explain why none of the touted cancers (such as
prostate, breast, and colon) outpaced melanoma growth during the sun-
avoidance decades. They will also need to explain why breast cancer
primarily afflicts women, when men are similarly susceptible to
vitamin D deficiency. They will need to explain why an internal organ
would get depleted first, when there's nothing to be gained from it
like there is with the skin. Then they will need to explain why one
person would get one disease, say multiple sclerosis, but another
person would get another disease, say rheumatoid arthritis, when
vitamin D is depleted in both. They will need to explain why the
disease is consistently more common in the north and less in the
south, since people in the north and south alike are susceptible to
vitamin D deficiency year-round. And on top of all that, they will
need to explain how on earth the greatest minds of medicine, working
painstakingly over the 20th century with the most advanced
technologies, could have completely missed vitamin D deficiency
causing so many major human illnesses.

Meanwhile, the most promising vitamin D deficiency disease--melanoma--
remains neglected.

James Semmel
Albuquerque, New Mexico



reference:
http://www.mpip.org/cgi-bin/mpip/dbforum.pl?db=main_bb&post=399827
Last month's follow up to the 4th annual discussion: "Is melanoma
simply a vitamin D deficiency cancer?"