|
From: jst on 23 Sep 2005 16:53 My wife just returned from he stress test with great results. She is 48 and in moderate condition from three a week one hour sessions at our gym. The Dr said her max HR was 191. Doing the old 220 - age calculation has me confused. She has always had very low blood pressure and has eaten well and I know that the HR calculation doesn't apply to everyone. When I had my stress test @ 46 I had a max HR of 176 which is more in line with the calculation. Any comments ??
From: joeu2004 on 23 Sep 2005 18:28 jst wrote: > My wife just returned from he stress test with great results. > She is 48 and in moderate condition from three a week one hour > sessions at our gym. The Dr said her max HR was 191. Doing > the old 220 - age calculation has me confused. She has always > had very low blood pressure and has eaten well Which is irrelevant to how high a person's MHR is. A person's MHR is not a measure of fitness or "great results". It does not depend on a person's "condition" -- although a person's ability to reach nearly her MHR does depend on her "conditioning". A person's MHR is based mostly on a her genetics. > and I know that the HR calculation doesn't apply to everyone. > When I had my stress test @ 46 I had a max HR of 176 which is > more in line with the calculation. Any comments ?? You answered it yourself. The age-based formulas (there are several in common use) are merely statistical averages. They all have a standard error of +/-12 or so. So, making some common assumptions, your wife's chances of being within +/-3 of her actual MHR -- 19 above her age-based average -- as she had of being within +/-2 of her age-based average, as you were. The real question is: what was your wife's HR recovery rate? A fast recovery rate is a measure of cardio fitness. Her doctor shuld have determined the HR recovery rate as part of the stress test. Another useful question: at what %MHR did your wife hit her lactate threshold? A high %MHR is a measure of cardio fitness. Her doctor's may or may not have determined her lactate threshold, depending on the diagnostic devices used during the stress test. You might ask.
From: joeu2004 on 23 Sep 2005 18:48 I wrote: > So, making some common assumptions, your wife's chances of > being within +/-3 of her actual MHR -- 19 above her age-based > average -- as she had of being within +/-2 of her age-based > average, as you were. Hmm, that sentence became the victim of over-editing. It was intended to read .... So, making some common assumptions, your wife's chances of being within +/-3 of her actual MHR -- 19 above her age-based average -- were nearly the same as her chances of being within +/-2 of her age-based average, as you were.
From: jst on 23 Sep 2005 19:18 Thanks for the response, I will be asking him what her recovery rate was and if there is anything else he can tell me. joeu2004(a)hotmail.com wrote: > I wrote: > >>So, making some common assumptions, your wife's chances of >>being within +/-3 of her actual MHR -- 19 above her age-based >>average -- as she had of being within +/-2 of her age-based >>average, as you were. > > > Hmm, that sentence became the victim of over-editing. > It was intended to read .... > > So, making some common assumptions, your wife's chances of > being within +/-3 of her actual MHR -- 19 above her age-based > average -- were nearly the same as her chances of being > within +/-2 of her age-based average, as you were. >
From: Bubba Joe Tyrone Malone on 26 Sep 2005 14:46 <joeu2004(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:1127514532.420424.51940(a)g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... > jst wrote: > The real question is: what was your wife's HR recovery rate? > A fast recovery rate is a measure of cardio fitness. Her > doctor shuld have determined the HR recovery rate as part of > the stress test. Interesting post -- is there any resource you know of for determining one's own MHR based on recovery rates? I ask because I'm finding I don't feel all that winded at 80 percent of what my age-based MHR should be, so I usually take it up 20 bpm or so for intervals.
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: My $0.02 on Lance Armstrong Next: Muscletech Anotesten and Nortesten side effects |