Mark Probert - I have a question
in [Alternative]
|
Prev: Thrombosis
Next: No Wonder Our Hospitals Are a Disaster -- People with Marketing Degrees Are Running Them
From: jurimed2 on 18 Aug 2008 12:03 On Aug 17, 6:18 pm, "Jan Drew" <jdrew1...(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > Hulda Clark is not the subject. > > http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.attn-deficit/msg/96f2269de... > > From: Mark Probert <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> > Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 14:18:49 -0700 (PDT) > Local: Sun, Aug 17 2008 5:18 pm > Subject: Re: Seven Gold-ADHD and Medicated > > Call me Mark "Diversion" Probert. Group: Just think - there are, up to this point, 172 messages in this thread, and not one of the responses from the "quackpot conspiracy" answers the original question proposed. Is anyone surprised? Of course not... "Diversion" is usual. But why? That's the question. After all, the original question talks, very seriously, about a subject, supposedly, very dear to the quackpot heart - "health fraud." In fact, the subject is about a very serious form of "health fraud," called "Fraudulent Denial of Claims." In this case, the one I described, as, obviously, both State and Federal felonies. And, Probert, who constantly claims he has expertise in this area, suddenly, and with obvious aggravation, doesn't want to pose as an expert anymore - especially about this particular subject. Hmmmmmmmmmm...... I wonder why? (sarcasm intended) Just to refresh all of our memories, I've included the original thread starter, just below: ------------------------------ "Mark: I have a project going on where I'm investigating some strange circumstances involving suspicious "Denial of Claim." Perhaps you can tell me where to look for the answers. I have nine "Denial" letters in several different States, for the same procedure, all purported to be written by different health professionals on behalf of different health insurance companies. The letters, however, very much appear to be written by the same person. Even more interesting is that in checking on EACH of the health professional letter author's validity, by tracing back the person themselves - EVERY ONE of the letter authors turn out NOT to be a real person. Every one of the Universities the authors claim, by using the University stationary to write their letters, NEVER HEARD of these people, and they do not, as the letters claim, work for those Universities. MORE, NONE of these letter writers actually seem to exist. NO State Board shows their presence, and the names of the letter writers appear to be made up of whole cloth. I think I have discovered a fraudulent operation, probably a service company to the health insurance industry. Since we are talking here about nine separate "Felonies," I wish to proceed cautiously. Got any ideas? Where can I find the culprits? Very amused in California... Tim Bolen |