Prev: Jan Drew LIED over and over.
Next: Seven questions for Richard Shultz - Plus he is a proven liar and hypocrite and so is Mark S Probert
From: Mark Thorson on 4 Aug 2008 14:00
You aren't fooling anybody with your use of
anonymous servers. It's part of your pattern
that is documented here:

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4183/is_20051128/ai_n15872662/print

A Baltimore manufacturer of weather instruments
is suing a fired employee it claims is on an
anonymous Internet rampage. Belfort Instrument
says Mark A. Kukucka has been harassing current
Belfort employees via e-mail, calling the
company's customers and partners alleging
unethical business practices, and posting trade
secrets on the Internet. Defendant Kukucka has
an alarming history of engaging in such 'anonymous'
Internet attacks against those who he believes may
have slighted him (including past employers), and,
absent a TRO, will continue his historical pattern
of making outrageous and harmful attacks against
the material business interests of Belfort
Instrument, reads Belfort's complaint, filed
earlier this month in Baltimore County Circuit
Court. Belfort, which obtained a temporary
restraining order against Kukucka on Nov. 15, is
suing him for misappropriating trade secrets,
breach of contract, defamation and tortious
interference with contractual relations. The
company is seeking $1 million. After consulting
with his client, Belfort attorney Douglas W.
Desmarais declined to speak about the case.
My client's position is that this is a dispute
that they have chosen to resolve through legal
channels, and they're going to let it play out
through legal channels, Desmarais said. Kukucka
could not be located for comment; his phone
number is unlisted and a reverse search of his
Kingsville address produced no results. According
to the complaint, when Kukucka started working
for Belfort in 2001, he signed a contract
promising that, if he left the company, for two
years afterward he would not say negative things
about it; if he did, he would face court action.
He is also bound by the Maryland Uniform Trade
Secrets Act not to divulge privileged information,
Belfort says. Kukucka was fired on Oct. 20 of
this year and then started to harass his
ex-girlfriend, still a Belfort employee, via
e-mail, the suit reads. He also allegedly
e-mailed the company's general mailbox anonymously,
promising to fight back against the company and
drive it out of business. The company also claims
he called their customers and made untrue
allegations. Kukucka also used an Internet
newsgroup to criticize the Belfort product he had
been in charge of marketing, the DigiWx AWOS
digital weather transmitter, calling it Digi$H*T,
Belfort claims. He also allegedly listed which of
Belfort's customers were using DigiWx. The motion
does not state how Belfort knows that Kukucka is
behind the anonymous e-mails, phone calls and
Internet postings, but a letter from Desmarais to
Kukucka warns that Belfort can easily trace the
communications to Kukucka. Belfort also claims
that Kukucka has a history of using pseudonyms
to criticize whoever has offended [him] on a
particular day. Indeed, a search of Google's
newsgroups shows lots of chatter about Kukucka,
including several posts purporting to unmask him
as the anonymous source of negative comments
about Baltimore and a Japan-based company called
Shimadzu, for which he allegedly worked at one
point.
From: Jan Drew on 4 Aug 2008 23:03

"Mark Thorson" <nospam(a)sonic.net> wrote in message
news:489743C7.9ECE2A45(a)sonic.net...
> You aren't fooling anybody with your use of
> anonymous servers. It's part of your pattern
> that is documented here:
>
> http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4183/is_20051128/ai_n15872662/print
>
> A Baltimore manufacturer of weather instruments
> is suing a fired employee it claims is on an
> anonymous Internet rampage. Belfort Instrument
> says Mark A. Kukucka has been harassing current
> Belfort employees via e-mail, calling the
> company's customers and partners alleging
> unethical business practices, and posting trade
> secrets on the Internet. Defendant Kukucka has
> an alarming history of engaging in such 'anonymous'
> Internet attacks against those who he believes may
> have slighted him (including past employers), and,
> absent a TRO, will continue his historical pattern
> of making outrageous and harmful attacks against
> the material business interests of Belfort
> Instrument, reads Belfort's complaint, filed
> earlier this month in Baltimore County Circuit
> Court. Belfort, which obtained a temporary
> restraining order against Kukucka on Nov. 15, is
> suing him for misappropriating trade secrets,
> breach of contract, defamation and tortious
> interference with contractual relations. The
> company is seeking $1 million. After consulting
> with his client, Belfort attorney Douglas W.
> Desmarais declined to speak about the case.
> My client's position is that this is a dispute
> that they have chosen to resolve through legal
> channels, and they're going to let it play out
> through legal channels, Desmarais said. Kukucka
> could not be located for comment; his phone
> number is unlisted and a reverse search of his
> Kingsville address produced no results. According
> to the complaint, when Kukucka started working
> for Belfort in 2001, he signed a contract
> promising that, if he left the company, for two
> years afterward he would not say negative things
> about it; if he did, he would face court action.
> He is also bound by the Maryland Uniform Trade
> Secrets Act not to divulge privileged information,
> Belfort says. Kukucka was fired on Oct. 20 of
> this year and then started to harass his
> ex-girlfriend, still a Belfort employee, via
> e-mail, the suit reads. He also allegedly
> e-mailed the company's general mailbox anonymously,
> promising to fight back against the company and
> drive it out of business. The company also claims
> he called their customers and made untrue
> allegations. Kukucka also used an Internet
> newsgroup to criticize the Belfort product he had
> been in charge of marketing, the DigiWx AWOS
> digital weather transmitter, calling it Digi$H*T,
> Belfort claims. He also allegedly listed which of
> Belfort's customers were using DigiWx. The motion
> does not state how Belfort knows that Kukucka is
> behind the anonymous e-mails, phone calls and
> Internet postings, but a letter from Desmarais to
> Kukucka warns that Belfort can easily trace the
> communications to Kukucka. Belfort also claims
> that Kukucka has a history of using pseudonyms
> to criticize whoever has offended [him] on a
> particular day. Indeed, a search of Google's
> newsgroups shows lots of chatter about Kukucka,
> including several posts purporting to unmask him
> as the anonymous source of negative comments
> about Baltimore and a Japan-based company called
> Shimadzu, for which he allegedly worked at one
> point.

Speaking of not fooling anybody.

"Mark Thorson" <nospam(a)sonic.net> wrote
> It just burns Jan up that I can post examples of her lies,

You wish, actually, it just shows your REPEATED lies and cheap tricks.

> but she can't do the same thing to me.

Think again.

YOU landed yourself in court.

With the below to say.

First, you have NO regard to what you have done to others.

One individual was responsible for a great deal of miscommunication
regarding
anatoxin-a, information which is still accessible on many Internet
sites. Cell
Tech sued Mark Thorson for posting defamatory statements about Cell
Tech, its
products and its personnel to various Internet or Usenet news groups.
Cell
Tech's lawsuit against Mr. Thorson has now been settled. As part of the


settlement agreement, Mr. Thorson has posted the Retraction Statement
that
appears below. Although he did retract the allegations that he had been
widely
circulating, we all know that one cannot, with a single correct
statement, undo
all the harm done by many mis-statements that continue to circulate.


The following is a retraction statement that Mark Thorson has posted to
various
newsgroups:


Subject: Retraction of Anatoxin-a Primer


During the last several years, I have from time to time posted to this
and
other newsgroups a file of information called "An Anatoxin-a Primer." I
now
retract the statements made in the Anatoxin-a Primer.


The Anatoxin-a Primer implied that Super Blue Green Algae from Klamath
Lake,
produced by Cell Tech, contains anatoxin-a (a neurotoxin I
characterized as
addictive), and that Cell Tech deliberately avoids testing for this
toxin
because anatoxin-a is responsible for the effects reported by SBGA
users. I
have since been advised that Cell Tech conducts regular tests that
would
disclose anatoxin-a, and that this toxin has never been found in Super
Blue
Green Algae. I had no basis for the suggestions I made in the
Anatoxin-a
Primer, and I hereby retract it in full.


Mis-state


to state incorrectly : give a false account of


False


intentionally untrue


lie


untrue with intent to deceive


===========

Having no basis is L Y I N G!

As for Mark Probert, he ia a DISBARRED ATTORNEY.

Your further lies are also noted.

LIAR.

YOU REPEATEDLY LIED OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER.


>I merely posted the URL
>to a database that had your PUBLIC information in it, the
>same information anyone could have found in a phone book.

Wrong.

>The URL to a database is:


http://www.switchboard.com



>At the top of that page is says:


>Telephone Directory.


In that posting, you posted a link that says at the top Switchboard *People
Results*


>I did not, otherwise a Google search on my name and this
>newsgroup for "Bryant" would turn up such a posting.


Can it Mark. Anyone can clearly see this Byrant things is just another
dirty
trick of yours.


You are a liar and you know it.



> At the time
>I posted it, three J. Drew's showed up in Bloomington,


Well now.


That was a people's results page and NOT the URLto a database that had your
PUBLIC information.


You went to the datebase, then you posted the results AFTER you did the
searching.


Now to prove the total liar, you are. You see Mark liars are sooner or later
exposed. Today is your day, and most likely you won't learn, that your
bringing
it up over and over, is a problem with you.


My asterisks added.


From: Mark Thorson (nos...(a)sonic.net)
Subject: Re: Admitting when one is wrong
View this article only
Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative
Date: 2002-05-26 21:30:10 PST



Karuna wrote:
> Is this what happened?

> Mark (Thorson): In July 2001, someone suggested to you, here on mha,
> that
> another poster was most likely female and also might be apprehensive
> about
> being harrassed by others on the 'net. You responded by posting a linked
> access to several names and phone numbers, one of which might be that
> person, thereby *inviting* such harrassment.


> Is that true?



**"Inviting" is your characterization, but I did post
the link to switchboard.com, which was a simple
search that yielded several names, any or none
of which could have been Jan, which came from
a public database.***


**And if Jan had said it that way, I would not have disputed the accuracy of
what she said, except in the area of intent.


*** It was more of an impulse***


decision, triggered by the previous posting in the thread


***It was as though a finger-shaped holes suddenly appeared in front of
me.**


****I couldn't resist sticking my finger in it.****


At the time, it didn'tseem like a big deal, because it was just like
calling up information on the phone. But I see now that it doesn't look any
different than encouraging harassment, so I agree that I shouldn't have done
it.


On this one point, Jan, I apologize. I do not wish any third party to
harass
you.
===


Mark Thorson
Sep 12 2004, 8:35 pm


You said I posted your address. Not true.


You said I posted search results. Not true.


For me to be a liar, there must have been a LIE.


YEARS LATER, YOU ARE STILL LYING!

 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Jan Drew LIED over and over.
Next: Seven questions for Richard Shultz - Plus he is a proven liar and hypocrite and so is Mark S Probert