M`I 5.Pe rsecution - MI5 Insis t that the se Faxe s mus t Continue
in [Hepatitis]
|
Prev: M-I,5`Per secution . MI 5 Wan t Me to Send Y ou the se F axes
Next: The Holistic method of healing in dealing with all sort of viral infection and that include hepatitis..
From: mefiemf on 31 Dec 2007 06:51 MI5 Persecution Update:. Friday 31 March, 2000 22,544 Faxes Delivered in Three Years,. and Still No Breakthrough In the last. three years I have sent at least 22,544 faxes to recipients in the UK, of which at least 13,974 have. gone to Westminster. Last weekend alone I sent 832 completed faxes to. politicians, the media and various others, on the subject of MI5s. mistreatment of me these last ten years. I believe some of the recipients know of MI5s. actions against me in the last decade; yet they maintain strict "omerta" in fear of the. security services persecution. actions being made public. MI5 Insist that these. Faxes must Continue Between September 1999 and mid-January 2000, the. persecutors, whoever they might be, mostly left me alone. I counted. only three incidents in almost five months - which is a lower rate than at any time since June. 1990, when this business. started. By. leaving me alone for several months, the "oppressors" were making an implicit assurance. that they would continue to leave me alone in the future.. On 11 January I posted to an internet newsgroup accepting what I saw as their assurance of no further harassment,. stating that I would cease sending these faxes - which is the only thing I do in my defence. - if they continued to leave me alone. And for two weeks I did. indeed refrain. from distributing these articles. But MI5 acted in bad faith. From the last week of January until. the beginning of March,. they resumed their hate campaign against me with a vengeance. They even put people in my road three times in February,. one instance. of which I recorded. They resumed their normal behaviour of bugging my phone and house, listening. to where I would go, and then placing people in that location to "aggravate and annoy". me. What MI5 did in February is plainly a. contravention of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997, since it has caused me "alarm. and distress" as specified in the Act. But it is a waste of. time going to the police with a complaint, since the police have done, and will do,. absolutely nothing. I complained to the Metropolitan Police in 1995, and they refused to take. my complaint. When I complained again in 1999,. the detective sergeant laughed at my complaint, with the words,. "It's an absolute load of rubbish. I don't investigate rubbish. I can't be more. blunt or to the point than that." It is useful to remember that the Met also. treated Stephen Lawrences. parents with similar discourtesy; police prejudices are similar in my case, so. I can take some comfort from that case and hope that one day I will. get a fair hearing. MI5 acted in bad faith, but they also acted with arrogance. They. do not care if I send 800 faxes every weekend, since they know I cannot. prove my claims, and the recent Shayler case shows how weak. external oversight is of the secret services. But they. acted with more than arrogance - the MI5 agents actually want my faxes to continue, they. insist that these faxes continue,. since my communications give them an excuse to continue their activities, and continue in. the paid employ of the secret service. Despite their use of. diverse proxies over the last ten years, it is the same MI5 officers behind the campaign all the time -. I have seen one of them on three occasions in Canada over. a period of years, and it is a safe belief that that same person continues. to be paid for his "work" in harassing me in London now. The average cost of an MI5 employee is some. 75,000 per annum, so one may. infer that their officers are amply compensated; their insistence. that "hostilities" are maintained is understandable when placed in this. light. 12421 -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service ------->>>>>>http://www.NewsDem |