From: Matti Narkia on
The randomized controlled clinical trial

Colene K. Stoernell, Christy C. Tangney, Susie W. Rockway
Short-term changes in lipoprotein subclasses and C-reactive protein
levels of hypertriglyceridemic adults on low-carbohydrate and low-fat
diets.
Nutrition Research, Volume 28, Issue 7, July 2008, Pages 443-449
doi:10.1016/j.nutres.2008.03.013
<http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6TB1-4SRF4JR-4&_user=10&_coverDate=07%2F31%2F2008&_rdoc=4&_fmt=high&_orig=browse&_srch=doc-info(%23toc%235129%232008%23999719992%23692228%23FLA%23display%23Volume)&_cdi=5129&_sort=d&_docanchor=&_ct=10&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=3aaa56656d641d4c38add051f8af1fad>
<http://tinyurl.com/54vsqs>

found that low-carbohydrate diet produced a less atherogenic lipid
profile than low-fat diet. Here's the abstract:

"Diets designed to promote weight loss and improve atherogenic
lipid profiles traditionally include a reduction in total fat and,
in particular, saturated fats. This study was designed to test the
efficacy of a low-fat diet vs a carbohydrate (CHO)–restricted
(low-CHO) diet in hypertriglyceridemic patients on lipid profile,
weight loss, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), and
satiety. Twenty-eight hypertriglyceridemic subjects (based on
fasting triacylglycerol [TG] levels exceeding 1.69 mmol/L) were
randomized to either the low-CHO or low-fat diet for 8 weeks.
Fasting bloods were acquired at weeks 0 and 8 and analyzed for
lipids and hs-CRP. Body weight and other anthropometric measures
were also obtained. Three random 24-hour food recalls were used to
assess compliance during the trial and 2 recalls before
randomization to permit individualized dietary education. A
significant time-by-treatment interaction was observed (P = .045),
wherein the small low-density lipoprotein cholesterol
concentrations were reduced by 46% in the low-CHO–assigned
subjects and increased by 36% for those assigned the low-fat plan.
The observed decrease in TG (18%) among low-CHO subjects, in
contrast to the 4% increase for low-fat group, was not significant,
nor were there significant differences in hs-CRP, overall dietary
compliance, satiety, or the magnitude of body weight loss between
groups (low-CHO group, -3.8% vs low-fat group, -1.6%). Favorable
reductions in small low-density lipoprotein concentrations after 8
weeks suggest that a moderately restricted carbohydrate diet (20%
CHO as energy) can promote a less atherogenic lipid profile when
compared to the low-fat diet."

Here's copy of the study's table, which gives the groups' detailed
lipid profiles in the beginning and the end of the trial:

<http://bp2.blogger.com/_pohv_nySzJE/SJgKDKk0GUI/AAAAAAAAAFo/D2tH0lzK6K4/s1600-h/nutr_res_2008.jpg>
<http://tinyurl.com/6kpgxn>

(provided by the Finnish language blog article

Parempi vähentää hiilihydraatteja kuin rasvaa?
<http://sundqvist.blogspot.com/2008/08/parempi-vhent-hiilihydraatteja-kuin.html>)



--
Matti Narkia

http://ma.gnolia.com/groups/Nutrition
From: Matti Narkia on
Matti Narkia wrote:
> The randomized controlled clinical trial
>
> Colene K. Stoernell, Christy C. Tangney, Susie W. Rockway
> Short-term changes in lipoprotein subclasses and C-reactive protein
> levels of hypertriglyceridemic adults on low-carbohydrate and low-fat
> diets.
> Nutrition Research, Volume 28, Issue 7, July 2008, Pages 443-449
> doi:10.1016/j.nutres.2008.03.013
> <http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6TB1-4SRF4JR-4&_user=10&_coverDate=07%2F31%2F2008&_rdoc=4&_fmt=high&_orig=browse&_srch=doc-info(%23toc%235129%232008%23999719992%23692228%23FLA%23display%23Volume)&_cdi=5129&_sort=d&_docanchor=&_ct=10&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=3aaa56656d641d4c38add051f8af1fad>
>
> <http://tinyurl.com/54vsqs>
>
> found that low-carbohydrate diet produced a less atherogenic lipid
> profile than low-fat diet. Here's the abstract:
>
> "Diets designed to promote weight loss and improve atherogenic
> lipid profiles traditionally include a reduction in total fat and,
> in particular, saturated fats. This study was designed to test the
> efficacy of a low-fat diet vs a carbohydrate (CHO)–restricted
> (low-CHO) diet in hypertriglyceridemic patients on lipid profile,
> weight loss, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), and
> satiety. Twenty-eight hypertriglyceridemic subjects (based on
> fasting triacylglycerol [TG] levels exceeding 1.69 mmol/L) were
> randomized to either the low-CHO or low-fat diet for 8 weeks.
> Fasting bloods were acquired at weeks 0 and 8 and analyzed for
> lipids and hs-CRP. Body weight and other anthropometric measures
> were also obtained. Three random 24-hour food recalls were used to
> assess compliance during the trial and 2 recalls before
> randomization to permit individualized dietary education. A
> significant time-by-treatment interaction was observed (P = .045),
> wherein the small low-density lipoprotein cholesterol
> concentrations were reduced by 46% in the low-CHO–assigned
> subjects and increased by 36% for those assigned the low-fat plan.
> The observed decrease in TG (18%) among low-CHO subjects, in
> contrast to the 4% increase for low-fat group, was not significant,
> nor were there significant differences in hs-CRP, overall dietary
> compliance, satiety, or the magnitude of body weight loss between
> groups (low-CHO group, -3.8% vs low-fat group, -1.6%). Favorable
> reductions in small low-density lipoprotein concentrations after 8
> weeks suggest that a moderately restricted carbohydrate diet (20%
> CHO as energy) can promote a less atherogenic lipid profile when
> compared to the low-fat diet."
>

Dr. Michael R. Eades comments this study in his blog article

Low-carb diet improves lipid profile better than low-fat diet
<http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/lipid-hypothesis/low-carb-diet-improves-lipid-profile-better-than-low-fat-diet/>
<http://tinyurl.com/6owr4t>

He also provides a link to the full text version of this study:

<http://www.scribd.com/doc/4482999/Lipid-changes-with-LC-diet-vs-LF-diet>


--
Matti Narkia

http://ma.gnolia.com/groups/Nutrition
From: Matti Narkia on
Matti Narkia wrote:
> Matti Narkia wrote:
>> The randomized controlled clinical trial
>>
>> Colene K. Stoernell, Christy C. Tangney, Susie W. Rockway
>> Short-term changes in lipoprotein subclasses and C-reactive protein
>> levels of hypertriglyceridemic adults on low-carbohydrate and low-fat
>> diets.
>> Nutrition Research, Volume 28, Issue 7, July 2008, Pages 443-449
>> doi:10.1016/j.nutres.2008.03.013
>> <http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6TB1-4SRF4JR-4&_user=10&_coverDate=07%2F31%2F2008&_rdoc=4&_fmt=high&_orig=browse&_srch=doc-info(%23toc%235129%232008%23999719992%23692228%23FLA%23display%23Volume)&_cdi=5129&_sort=d&_docanchor=&_ct=10&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=3aaa56656d641d4c38add051f8af1fad>
>>
>> <http://tinyurl.com/54vsqs>
>>
>> found that low-carbohydrate diet produced a less atherogenic lipid
>> profile than low-fat diet. Here's the abstract:
>>
>> "Diets designed to promote weight loss and improve atherogenic
>> lipid profiles traditionally include a reduction in total fat and,
>> in particular, saturated fats. This study was designed to test the
>> efficacy of a low-fat diet vs a carbohydrate (CHO)–restricted
>> (low-CHO) diet in hypertriglyceridemic patients on lipid profile,
>> weight loss, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), and
>> satiety. Twenty-eight hypertriglyceridemic subjects (based on
>> fasting triacylglycerol [TG] levels exceeding 1.69 mmol/L) were
>> randomized to either the low-CHO or low-fat diet for 8 weeks.
>> Fasting bloods were acquired at weeks 0 and 8 and analyzed for
>> lipids and hs-CRP. Body weight and other anthropometric measures
>> were also obtained. Three random 24-hour food recalls were used to
>> assess compliance during the trial and 2 recalls before
>> randomization to permit individualized dietary education. A
>> significant time-by-treatment interaction was observed (P = .045),
>> wherein the small low-density lipoprotein cholesterol
>> concentrations were reduced by 46% in the low-CHO–assigned
>> subjects and increased by 36% for those assigned the low-fat plan.
>> The observed decrease in TG (18%) among low-CHO subjects, in
>> contrast to the 4% increase for low-fat group, was not significant,
>> nor were there significant differences in hs-CRP, overall dietary
>> compliance, satiety, or the magnitude of body weight loss between
>> groups (low-CHO group, -3.8% vs low-fat group, -1.6%). Favorable
>> reductions in small low-density lipoprotein concentrations after 8
>> weeks suggest that a moderately restricted carbohydrate diet (20%
>> CHO as energy) can promote a less atherogenic lipid profile when
>> compared to the low-fat diet."
>>
>
> Dr. Michael R. Eades comments this study in his blog article
>
> Low-carb diet improves lipid profile better than low-fat diet
> <http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/lipid-hypothesis/low-carb-diet-improves-lipid-profile-better-than-low-fat-diet/>
>
> <http://tinyurl.com/6owr4t>
>
> He also provides a link to the full text version of this study:
>
> <http://www.scribd.com/doc/4482999/Lipid-changes-with-LC-diet-vs-LF-diet>
>
>
In his blog article Eades mentions that in the LC group saturated fat was
limited to less than 10 percent of calories. That's a bit strange, and
because of that this study cannot really say anything about the
potential effect of saturated fat.

--
Matti Narkia

http://ma.gnolia.com/groups/Nutrition
From: Cocoabean on
On Aug 5, 8:37 pm, Matti Narkia <m...(a)mbnet.fi> wrote:
> Matti Narkia wrote:
> > Matti Narkia wrote:
> >> The randomized controlled clinical trial
>
> >> Colene K. Stoernell, Christy C. Tangney, Susie W. Rockway
> >> Short-term changes in lipoprotein subclasses and C-reactive protein
> >> levels of hypertriglyceridemic adults on low-carbohydrate and low-fat
> >> diets.
> >> Nutrition Research, Volume 28, Issue 7, July 2008, Pages 443-449
> >> doi:10.1016/j.nutres.2008.03.013
> >> <http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6TB1-4SRF4J...>
>
> >> <http://tinyurl.com/54vsqs>
>
> >> found that low-carbohydrate diet produced a less atherogenic lipid
> >> profile than low-fat diet. Here's the abstract:
>
> >>     "Diets designed to promote weight loss and improve atherogenic
> >>     lipid  profiles traditionally include a reduction in total fat and,
> >>     in particular, saturated fats. This study was designed to test the
> >>     efficacy of a low-fat diet vs a carbohydrate (CHO)–restricted
> >>     (low-CHO) diet in hypertriglyceridemic patients on lipid profile,
> >>     weight loss, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), and
> >>     satiety. Twenty-eight hypertriglyceridemic subjects (based on
> >>     fasting triacylglycerol [TG] levels exceeding 1.69 mmol/L) were
> >>     randomized to either the low-CHO or low-fat diet for 8 weeks.
> >>     Fasting bloods were acquired at weeks 0 and 8 and analyzed for
> >>     lipids and hs-CRP. Body weight and other anthropometric measures
> >>     were also obtained. Three random 24-hour food recalls were used to
> >>     assess compliance during the trial and 2 recalls before
> >>     randomization to permit individualized dietary education. A
> >>     significant time-by-treatment interaction was observed (P = ..045),
> >>     wherein the small low-density lipoprotein cholesterol
> >>     concentrations  were reduced by 46% in the low-CHO–assigned
> >>     subjects and increased by 36% for those assigned the low-fat plan.
> >>     The observed decrease in TG (18%) among low-CHO subjects, in
> >>     contrast to the 4% increase for low-fat group, was not significant,
> >>     nor were there significant differences in hs-CRP, overall dietary
> >>     compliance, satiety, or the magnitude of body weight loss between
> >>     groups (low-CHO group, -3.8% vs low-fat group, -1.6%). Favorable
> >>     reductions in small low-density lipoprotein concentrations after 8
> >>     weeks suggest that a moderately restricted carbohydrate diet (20%
> >>     CHO as energy) can promote a less atherogenic lipid profile when
> >>     compared to the low-fat diet."
>
> > Dr. Michael R. Eades comments this study in his blog article
>
> > Low-carb diet improves lipid profile better than low-fat diet
> > <http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/lipid-hypothesis/low-carb-diet-imp....>
>
> > <http://tinyurl.com/6owr4t>
>
> > He also provides a link to the full text version of this study:
>
> > <http://www.scribd.com/doc/4482999/Lipid-changes-with-LC-diet-vs-LF-diet>
>
> In his blog article Eades mentions that in the LC group saturated fat was
> limited to less than 10 percent of calories. That's a bit strange, and
> because of that this study cannot really say anything about the
> potential effect of saturated fat.
>
> --
> Matti Narkia
>
> http://ma.gnolia.com/groups/Nutrition

How 'bout a Low carb AND Low fat diet. New site written by a
cardiologist with the Dept of Health:
http://cardiologist-wife.com/Cardiologists_Wifes_Chocolate_Too_Diet/Home.html

Gorgeous to look at too!
:)

From: Ron Peterson on
On Aug 5, 10:46 pm, Cocoabean <rojom...(a)optonline.net> wrote:

> How 'bout a Low carb AND Low fat diet. New site written by a
> cardiologist with the Dept of Health:http://cardiologist-wife.com/Cardiologists_Wifes_Chocolate_Too_Diet/H...

I think that they are a little extreme in criticizing fish because it
contains cholesterol.

The only fatty acids they object to is SFA. Soy flour seems to be a
major cooking ingredient.

--
Ron