From: Greegor on
On Aug 12, 11:47 pm, Raving <raving.loo...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Aug 13, 12:13 am, Linda <indomitab...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Aug 12, 8:28 pm, Raving <raving.loo...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Aug 12, 10:44 pm, Linda <indomitab...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > >http://www.net-security.org/secworld.php?id=8869
>
> > >http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/article/845967--speeding-boast-online....
>
> > > 'Guilty' or 'Not Guilty' Linda?
>
> > > If you answer the question one way or the other you will have been
> > > trolled.
>
> > How bout you estimate the unestimable number of ordinary folks whose
> > lives were completely destroyed by their having been hacked,  and
> > their having their personally identifying information plastered all
> > across the WWW accompanied by 100,000,000 defamatory articles,... etc.
>
> You are getting much closer.  It is super easy eh?
>
> The problem is that culture and custom lags substantially behind the
> information appliance of the internet age in predominant ways.

This last rant by Linda makes more sense
than her others.

She's ticked off about bureaucratic stupidity.

OK, I get it.

So if she's so ticked off about bureaucratic
stupidity, then what political party is she
pulling for?

More to the point, if she hates bureaucracy
then is she a big fan of the political left??

How would a rabid left winger rationalize
their gripes about large government or bureaucracy?

Shouldn't she be in Nirvana with our current President?