From: Peter Bowditch on
Tess <XXFlamingStarrXX(a)aol.com> wrote:

>On Sep 28, 2:08?am, Annie <SNIFFFT...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sep 27, 9:52?pm, schu...(a)mail.biu.ack.il (Richard Schultz) wrote:
>>
>> > I'd ask for your evidence that the conspiracy involves 57 people, but I
>> > believe that it was established by the very first cultural allusion that
>> > went over your head that you have no idea who Angela Lansbury is. ?Now if
>> > you knew who Laurence Harvey was, you'd have another piece of the puzzle.
>>
>> >Laurence Harvey was Domino's father. ?Domino was a bounty hunter.
>>
>> Angela Lansbury--Murder She Wrote - Mame.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Harvey, daughter of the late British actor Laurence Harvey and
>supermodel Paulene Stone, had led a tormented, eccentric existence.
>She ran a London dance club, worked as a ranch hand in San Diego, then
>became a "bail recovery agent," hunting fugitives and carrying a
>shotgun she called Betsy.
>
>A statuesque, 5-foot-9 blond, she seemed addicted to excitement, to
>adrenaline, as much as to cocaine and heroin.
>
>
>Angela Lansbury was british born came to the US with Mother, twin
>younger brothers during the the last blitzkrieg in England. She became
>a US citizen in 1951, many of her extended family were politically
>connected in England.
>
>Her movie bio is extensive and she started as the "other woman" in
>many of her "starter" movies... Her appearence with Judy Garland in
>the "HARVEY GIRLS" was one of the first "CAT" fights, (between Judy
>and Angela).
>
>SHE played Elvis's mother in Blue Hawaii, (her southern accent was
>awfully thick, and would fade every now and then and become a little
>British clipped)
>
>But don't see any CLUE and/or connection to Laurence Harvey or his
>Daughter, unless you want to go to the stretch of Harvey Girls movie
>and His Daughter (a "HARVEY" girl)
>
>Don't know if either have "homeopathic" connections to anything.
>But then again that type of choice is clearly personnal, and is no
>one's business but the user, and if Chemical companies and/or
>supporters of said companies have a problem then that is on them.
>They get enough kick back from doctors, hospital and clinics by
>prescribing drugs, plus the $$ they make on the prescriptions
>themselves.
>
>IMHO, I feel that there is enough chemical imbalance in environment
>that we asborb on a daily basis that we have no control over, so if
>one chooses to use alternative treatments then GO FOR IT. The human
>body can only take so much and then it starts it's own rebellion.
>My gosh, I listen to those Drug commercials on television, and the
>side effects alone would be enough of a deterrment to not use the
>stuff. Blod clots, losing sight, bowel impairment, kidney,liver
>damage, heart attack.....who in their sensible mind would even
>entertain the idea of putting something in their body that would cause
>ANY of the above.
>
>If this Quackwatch company/business is supporting/endorsing the
>production and distribution of drugs/prescriptions that cause physical
>damage to people who are looking for a solution/cure, they have that
>right as being a business But that does not give them the right to
>resort to persue those who choose to use other options in a negative
>manner. I am sure that they make enough money to keep them solvent,
>otherwise they would not be in the business they are. But if not,
>then find other sources to increase their cash flow, instead of
>attacking people on a personal or business level.
>This is a America, it is in the Constitution that states that we have
>the right to "....LIFE, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness", and
>however people choose to treat what ever medical distress that we
>acquire, we have the right to seek treatment that we feel is best for
>US.

Wow! Nice rant.

By the way, could you please point me to the clause in the US
Constitution which includes the words "LIFE, Liberty, and the Pursuit
of Happiness". Do not quote from some other document.


--
Peter Bowditch aa #2243
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au
Australian Skeptics http://www.skeptics.com.au
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com
From: Annie on
On Sep 29, 5:40 am, Peter Bowditch <myfirstn...(a)ratbags.com> wrote:
> >On Sep 28, 2:11 pm, Peter Bowditch <myfirstn...(a)ratbags.com> wrote:
> >. Debbie mentions Paul Revere and
> >> the Raiders as being involved somehow in her personal affairs.
>
> >I said nothing of the kind.
>
> That's the second time you have felt the need to reply to the same
> message with a denial. What have you got to hide?
>
I said NOTHING of the kind. You keep doing what it is that the
Quackwatch
brat pack do so well, take everything out of context so it suits them.

I am not hiding anything, I am simply correcting your lies.

Once more, Debbie Harry sings to you.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t1PePUCREis&feature=related
From: Annie on
On Sep 29, 3:34 am, Mark Probert <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:

>
> The website completely distorts this, if it were the basis for what
> they posted. The distortion sound just like you and Bolen.
>

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t1PePUCREis&feature=related
From: Annie on
On Sep 29, 3:32 am, Mark Probert <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Sure, more lies posted about me. Not to worry, I never threaten.

I'm only posting what you wrote, or what others have written. It must
be
difficult for a nimrod like you to have to eat your own words.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t1PePUCREis&feature=related
From: Peter Bowditch on
Annie <SNIFFFThis(a)gmail.com> wrote:

>On Sep 29, 5:40�am, Peter Bowditch <myfirstn...(a)ratbags.com> wrote:
>> >On Sep 28, 2:11�pm, Peter Bowditch <myfirstn...(a)ratbags.com> wrote:
>> >. Debbie mentions Paul Revere and
>> >> the Raiders as being involved somehow in her personal affairs.
>>
>> >I said nothing of the kind.
>>
>> That's the second time you have felt the need to reply to the same
>> message with a denial. What have you got to hide?
>>
>I said NOTHING of the kind. You keep doing what it is that the
>Quackwatch
>brat pack do so well, take everything out of context so it suits them.

Thrice denied.

(That's a cultural reference, in case you didn't pick it up.)

>
>I am not hiding anything, I am simply correcting your lies.
>
>Once more, Debbie Harry sings to you.
>
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t1PePUCREis&feature=related

I didn't like the talentless junkie the first time. Why would I want
to hear it again? Haven't you got any Paul Revere and the Raiders
songs to suggest, or don't you hang with them any more?


--
Peter Bowditch aa #2243
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au
Australian Skeptics http://www.skeptics.com.au
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
Prev: stop hair loss now
Next: Flu Vaccine Facts