From: Mark Probert on
On Sep 28, 9:55 pm, Annie <SNIFFFT...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sep 28, 6:47 pm, Mark Probert <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Thanks for letting me know that I am being misrepresented. Sounds like
> > either YOU or Bolen are up to no good.
>
> It was out on the internet.  Did not get it from anyone.
> Do not blame Bolen or Me.

WHO put it on the internet? The verbiage sounds just like YOU and
Bolen.

> There are other references which will be forthcoming.

Sure, more lies posted about me. Not to worry, I never threaten.



From: Mark Probert on
On Sep 28, 9:58 pm, Annie <SNIFFFT...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sep 28, 6:47 pm, Mark Probert <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Thanks for letting me know that I am being misrepresented. Sounds like
> > either YOU or Bolen are up to no good.
>
> http://www.humanticsfoundation.com/propagandistprobert.html

BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAH!
From: Mark Probert on
On Sep 28, 10:02 pm, Annie <SNIFFFT...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sep 28, 6:47 pm, Mark Probert <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Thanks for letting me know that I am being misrepresented. Sounds like
> > either YOU or Bolen are up to no good.
>
> From your own mouth, less than 1 year ago.

The website completely distorts this, if it were the basis for what
they posted. The distortion sound just like you and Bolen.

  "Anyone at Quackwatch is
> an expert."  If you are not connected, how would you know that?
>
> Mark Probert
> View profile
>   (2 users)  More options Dec 31 2007, 9:25 pm
>
> Debbee wrote:
> > On Dec 29, 8:58 pm, Mark Probert <markprob...(a)lumbercartel.com> wrote:
> >> Debbee wrote:
> >>> On Dec 29, 7:58 pm, Mark Probert <markprob...(a)lumbercartel.com> wrote:
> >>>> Probert:  Maybe the question needed to be answered by an expert.
> >>> Debbee: Who is an expert?
> >> Probert:  Anyone at Quackwatch.
> > So what doctors are at Quackwatch, and what is their expertise level?
> > I thought Quackwatch was a website.
>
> With numerous authors of many articles addressing various forms of
> quackery.

From: Peter Bowditch on
Annie <SNIFFFThis(a)gmail.com> wrote:

>On Sep 28, 2:11�pm, Peter Bowditch <myfirstn...(a)ratbags.com> wrote:
>. Debbie mentions Paul Revere and
>> the Raiders as being involved somehow in her personal affairs.
>>
>>
>
>I said nothing of the kind.

That's the second time you have felt the need to reply to the same
message with a denial. What have you got to hide?

>
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t1PePUCREis&feature=related

I remember when DH toured Australia and said in an interview that the
best thing about the place was the quality of the heroin, but I don't
see what she has to do with the current discussion.

--
Peter Bowditch aa #2243
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au
Australian Skeptics http://www.skeptics.com.au
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com
From: Peter Bowditch on
schultr(a)mail.biu.ack.il (Richard Schultz) wrote:

>In article <22a32f4c-fa65-4fd7-a82c-dffbacd66263(a)n38g2000prl.googlegroups.com>, Annie <SNIFFFThis(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>: On Sep 29, 1:03?am, schu...(a)mail.biu.ack.il (Richard Schultz) wrote:
>:
>:> I didn't think that you would, even though I've given you far more than
>:> enough clues. ?Remember, this thing started when I conjectured that
>:> Debbee's husband was driving her insane by turning the gaslight up and
>:> down and pretending not to notice anything.
>
>: Are you on some kind of psychotic drugs or do you just make things up
>: as you go along?
>
>I'm not making anything up -- I'm referring to article
><g27rn6$bve$5(a)news.iucc.ac.il> in which I said
>
>## Let me guess -- the gas lighting in your house has been mysteriously getting
>## brighter and dimmer, and your suave husband claims not to notice anything.
>
>Your response, as you obviously don't recall, is what motivated me to
>opine that you are no Ingrid Bergman. And nothing that's happened in
>the nearly four months since then has given me any reason to change my
>opinion.

That's at least two Ingrid Bergman allusions she's missed. (The other
was Mark Thorson left on a railway station.)

A tragedy, tonight.

--
Peter Bowditch aa #2243
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au
Australian Skeptics http://www.skeptics.com.au
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35
Prev: stop hair loss now
Next: Flu Vaccine Facts