From: Rupert on
So, Derek, show me how I've got it wrong. There's such a thing as a
coherent animal rights position, is there? Tell me all about it.

Am I morally entitled to buy antipsychotic medication, tofu,
electricity? Why?
From: Dutch on
Rupert wrote:
> So, Derek, show me how I've got it wrong. There's such a thing as a
> coherent animal rights position, is there? Tell me all about it.

He won't, he can't, there isn't.

> Am I morally entitled to buy antipsychotic medication, tofu,
> electricity? Why?

Yes, because the needs of humans trump the needs of
other animals.
From: Rupert on
On Aug 23, 12:39 pm, Dutch <n...(a)email.com> wrote:
> Rupert wrote:
> > So, Derek, show me how I've got it wrong. There's such a thing as a
> > coherent animal rights position, is there? Tell me all about it.
>
> He won't, he can't, there isn't.
>
> > Am I morally entitled to buy antipsychotic medication, tofu,
> > electricity? Why?
>
> Yes, because the needs of humans trump the needs of
> other animals.

We'll wait and see what Derek has to say; you also are welcome to try
to show me the true path if you feel so inclined, but last time you
weren't.
From: Dutch on
Rupert wrote:
> On Aug 23, 12:39 pm, Dutch <n...(a)email.com> wrote:
>> Rupert wrote:
>>> So, Derek, show me how I've got it wrong. There's such a thing as a
>>> coherent animal rights position, is there? Tell me all about it.
>> He won't, he can't, there isn't.
>>
>>> Am I morally entitled to buy antipsychotic medication, tofu,
>>> electricity? Why?
>> Yes, because the needs of humans trump the needs of
>> other animals.
>
> We'll wait and see what Derek has to say; you also are welcome to try
> to show me the true path if you feel so inclined, but last time you
> weren't.

The true path if you want to call it that is to be
reasonable. Don't fall into semantic potholes like
thinking that "speciesism" is anything like "sexism".
We're not saints, we're animals. The world is dense
with living organisms, we can't avoid killing them,
our species is in competition with them. Don't torture
animals, don't act with callous disregard for them.
Try to act in ways that protect the environment,
support and advocate for ways to improve conditions
for animals. People like Derek who claim to believe in
or that they are in accordance with extreme AR theory
are delusional. I know that was not what you wanted to
hear, but it's the answer.
From: Rupert on
On Aug 23, 3:37 pm, Dutch <n...(a)email.com> wrote:
> Rupert wrote:
> > On Aug 23, 12:39 pm, Dutch <n...(a)email.com> wrote:
> >> Rupert wrote:
> >>> So, Derek, show me how I've got it wrong. There's such a thing as a
> >>> coherent animal rights position, is there? Tell me all about it.
> >> He won't, he can't, there isn't.
>
> >>> Am I morally entitled to buy antipsychotic medication, tofu,
> >>> electricity? Why?
> >> Yes, because the needs of humans trump the needs of
> >> other animals.
>
> > We'll wait and see what Derek has to say; you also are welcome to try
> > to show me the true path if you feel so inclined, but last time you
> > weren't.
>
> The true path if you want to call it that is to be
> reasonable.

Well, I remember people used to give me a hard time about the word
"reasonable". I don't see how any of my current practice is
unreasonable.

> Don't fall into semantic potholes like
> thinking that "speciesism" is anything like "sexism".
> We're not saints, we're animals. The world is dense
> with living organisms, we can't avoid killing them,
> our species is in competition with them. Don't torture
> animals, don't act with callous disregard for them.
> Try to act in ways that protect the environment,
> support and advocate for ways to improve conditions
> for animals. People like Derek who claim to believe in
> or that they are in accordance with extreme AR theory
> are delusional. I know that was not what you wanted to
> hear, but it's the answer.

Actually, I agree with everything from "The world is..." to "...are
delusional."