From: GysdeJongh on
Diabetes. 2008 Jul;57(7):1768-73.

Neurophysiological pathways to obesity: below awareness and beyond
individual control.



A global obesity epidemic is occurring simultaneously with ongoing increases
in the availability and salience of food in the environment. Obesity is
increasing across all socioeconomic groups and educational levels and occurs
even among individuals with the highest levels of education and expertise in
nutrition and related fields. Given these circumstances, it is plausible
that excessive food consumption occurs in ways that defy personal insight or
are below individual awareness. The current food environment stimulates
automatic reflexive responses that enhance the desire to eat and increase
caloric intake, making it exceedingly difficult for individuals to resist,
especially because they may not be aware of these influences. This article
identifies 10 neurophysiological pathways that can lead people to make food
choices subconsciously or, in some cases, automatically. These pathways
include reflexive and uncontrollable neurohormonal responses to food images,
cues, and smells; mirror neurons that cause people to imitate the eating
behavior of others without awareness; and limited cognitive capacity to make
informed decisions about food. Given that people have limited ability to
shape the food environment individually and no ability to control automatic
responses to food-related cues that are unconsciously perceived, it is
incumbent upon society as a whole to regulate the food environment,
including the number and types of food-related cues, portion sizes, food
availability, and food advertising.



PMID: 18586908



It is often assumed that people make decisions about food and eating in
rational conscious ways. However, if this were so, the obesity epidemic
would not be happening. People overconsume in response to environmental cues
and they lack insight into the extent to which their food choices and eating
behaviors are being manipulated by sophisticated advertising and marketing
techniques. They also have a limited capacity to sort through the
increasingly overwhelming mountains of information and claims about food
choices and, as a result, too often choose default option foods high in fat
and sugar that, when consumed routinely, lead to chronic diseases. Society
needs to act as a whole to reshape the environment to improve the quality
and quantity of food we obtain, since the present environment makes it too
difficult for most people to do by themselves. Regulations addressing food
cues, food availability, portion sizes, and advertising are needed.



hth

Gys




From: Alan S on
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 08:22:48 +0200, "GysdeJongh"
<jongh711(a)planet.nl> wrote:

>Given that people have limited ability to
>shape the food environment individually and no ability to control automatic
>responses to food-related cues that are unconsciously perceived, it is
>incumbent upon society as a whole to regulate the food environment,
>including the number and types of food-related cues, portion sizes, food
>availability, and food advertising.
>

I thought 1984 was a quarter of a century ago; this author
would like it to be next year.

Soylent Red anyone?


Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia.
--
Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter.
Blog http://loraldiabetes.blogspot.com
DLife column http://tinyurl.com/5v74xr
http://loraltravel.blogspot.com (The Taj Mahal)
From: Nicky on
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 08:22:48 +0200, "GysdeJongh" <jongh711(a)planet.nl>
wrote:

>Diabetes. 2008 Jul;57(7):1768-73.
><snip>
>This article
>identifies 10 neurophysiological pathways that can lead people to make food
>choices subconsciously or, in some cases, automatically. These pathways
>include reflexive and uncontrollable neurohormonal responses to food images,
>cues, and smells; mirror neurons that cause people to imitate the eating
>behavior of others without awareness; and limited cognitive capacity to make
>informed decisions about food.

I think they're forgetting insulin resistance and carb hunger.

><snip> People overconsume in response to environmental cues
>and they lack insight into the extent to which their food choices and eating
>behaviors are being manipulated by sophisticated advertising and marketing
>techniques. They also have a limited capacity to sort through the
>increasingly overwhelming mountains of information and claims about food
>choices and, as a result, too often choose default option foods high in fat
>and sugar that, when consumed routinely, lead to chronic diseases.

High carb, particularly HFCS, would be my suspects. But even here,
where HFCS isn't so much of a problem, most low fat foods are stuffed
with fast-carb fillers. Losing the high fat fear factor would be
useful.

>Society
>needs to act as a whole to reshape the environment to improve the quality
>and quantity of food we obtain, since the present environment makes it too
>difficult for most people to do by themselves. Regulations addressing food
>cues, food availability, portion sizes, and advertising are needed.

Quality, I'd agree with. I don't see the point in more regulations...
Dumping the food pyramid would be a good step, IMO.

Nicky.
T2 dx 05/04 + underactive thyroid
D&E, 100ug thyroxine
Last A1c 5.4% BMI 25
From: Trinkwasser on
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 13:08:00 +0100, Nicky <ukc802466929(a)btconnect.com>
wrote:

>On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 08:22:48 +0200, "GysdeJongh" <jongh711(a)planet.nl>
>wrote:
>
>>Diabetes. 2008 Jul;57(7):1768-73.
>><snip>
>>This article
>>identifies 10 neurophysiological pathways that can lead people to make food
>>choices subconsciously or, in some cases, automatically. These pathways
>>include reflexive and uncontrollable neurohormonal responses to food images,
>>cues, and smells; mirror neurons that cause people to imitate the eating
>>behavior of others without awareness; and limited cognitive capacity to make
>>informed decisions about food.
>
>I think they're forgetting insulin resistance and carb hunger.

carbs good, fat bad, you need to go in for regrooving

>><snip> People overconsume in response to environmental cues
>>and they lack insight into the extent to which their food choices and eating
>>behaviors are being manipulated by sophisticated advertising and marketing
>>techniques. They also have a limited capacity to sort through the
>>increasingly overwhelming mountains of information and claims about food
>>choices and, as a result, too often choose default option foods high in fat
>>and sugar that, when consumed routinely, lead to chronic diseases.
>
>High carb, particularly HFCS, would be my suspects. But even here,
>where HFCS isn't so much of a problem, most low fat foods are stuffed
>with fast-carb fillers. Losing the high fat fear factor would be
>useful.

YES!!! Strange how all these phsyiological dietary problems suddenly
mushroomed around the time of onset of the Healthy High Carb Low Fat
Diet, whatever the form of the (usually fast) carbs.

>>Society
>>needs to act as a whole to reshape the environment to improve the quality
>>and quantity of food we obtain, since the present environment makes it too
>>difficult for most people to do by themselves. Regulations addressing food
>>cues, food availability, portion sizes, and advertising are needed.
>
>Quality, I'd agree with. I don't see the point in more regulations...
>Dumping the food pyramid would be a good step, IMO.

Or turning it upside down a la Harvard
From: GysdeJongh on
"Alan S" <loralgtweightandcarbs(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ihld84l3711qt9l0oa8o8nn6f315ma95rr(a)4ax.com...
> On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 08:22:48 +0200, "GysdeJongh"
> <jongh711(a)planet.nl> wrote:
>
> I thought 1984 was a quarter of a century ago; this author
> would like it to be next year.
>
> Soylent Red anyone?
>

Hi Alan,
I too like to think that I'm completely in charge of what I put in my mouth,
but is that true....I'm not sure.The hypothesis that there is something
beyond my consious control does not sound unfamiliar for me.... Call it
"fall of the wagon" , "irresistable carb craving" , "weight loss stall"....

Gys