Prev: We The People Demand The Release of MLK's FBI Files
Next: When You Need Medication For Panic Attacks
From: Legs Akimbo on 27 Jul 2008 21:00
american.male.1986(a)gmail.com wrote:

> Here it is, Gomer: If you took a group of 100 white babies and 100
> black babies, and put them on a desert island with blind caretakers,
> which race would grow up to cause more trouble on the island, the
> whites, the blacks, or would race not be a factor?

It's a trick question. They'd all be dead because the blind
caretakers would lose them and they'd get eaten by vermin.
From: american.male.1986 on 27 Jul 2008 21:15
On Jul 27, 9:00 pm, Legs Akimbo <u...(a)example.net> wrote:
> american.male.1...(a)gmail.com wrote:
> > Here it is, Gomer: If you took a group of 100 white babies and 100
> > black babies, and put them on a desert island with blind caretakers,
> > which race would grow up to cause more trouble on the island, the
> > whites, the blacks, or would race not be a factor?
>
> It's a trick question. They'd all be dead because the blind
> caretakers would lose them and they'd get eaten by vermin.

OK, now that the weak humor part is over, what is your answer?
From: american.male.1986 on 29 Jul 2008 10:13
On Jul 29, 10:00 am, "tar~bal" <b...(a)wheeze.net> wrote:

>
> Post your proof that any unwanted variables affected the measure or that
> anything was manipulated.

hahah. You're not a scientist, are you? You've got it backwards. You
don't find a correlation, pick one of any possible causes as the
'real' cause, then leave it to others to prove that you're wrong. You
have to prove why YOU are right.

Did you really think it works the other way, or are you just
scrambling?

>
>
>
> > Why did you ignore all that? Address that issue, don't grab the
> > opportunity for some lame dig to use as a crutch.
>
> I ignored it because it was speculation on your part.

I'm *speculating* that you can't attribute cause and effect based on a
correlation? hahah.

You are WAY out of your element.

>Until you can post
> some proof that it was manipulated, I won't dignify your silly assertion

It's not MY assertion. It's the assertion of the entire scientific
community. Are you going to take them on? Do you somehow think
you'll have better luck than you do going up against just ME?

hahaha.

>
> > "charted down"? That was a transparently vague term! Tell me what
> > you mean by that.
>
> You're a smart guy, figure it out yourself.

You give a vague term then refuse to clarify it.

Too funny.

hehe.

From: american.male.1986a on 29 Jul 2008 10:40
On Jul 29, 10:31 am, Drumrboy <drum...(a)aql.com> wrote:
> On 2008-07-29 10:00:45 -0400, "tar~bal" <b...(a)wheeze.net> said:
>
> > You're a smart guy, figure it out yourself.
>
> She hates when you do that.
>

Actually, I like it, because it's a clear acknowledgment that the
other person doesn't know or knows the answer is self-damaging. It's
the equivalent of a child saying "Well, if you don't know, *I'm* not
going to tell you!" - it's an implicit acknowledgment that the child
doesn't know or doesn't want to answer.

That was probably too complicated for you. So I'll wait for a lame
humor crutch...

From: tar~bal on 29 Jul 2008 14:00

<american.male.1986a(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:3c0d8c7a-5c06-417f-8378-63a6fc7b4a8a(a)c65g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...
> On Jul 29, 10:31 am, Drumrboy <drum...(a)aql.com> wrote:
>> On 2008-07-29 10:00:45 -0400, "tar~bal" <b...(a)wheeze.net> said:
>>
>> > You're a smart guy, figure it out yourself.
>>
>> She hates when you do that.
>>
>
> Actually, I like it, because it's a clear acknowledgment that the
> other person doesn't know or knows the answer is self-damaging. It's
> the equivalent of a child saying "Well, if you don't know, *I'm* not
> going to tell you!" - it's an implicit acknowledgment that the child
> doesn't know or doesn't want to answer.
>
> That was probably too complicated for you. So I'll wait for a lame
> humor crutch...
>

And god forbid that we interject any humor into any discussion with you.
After all, you're a big Howard fan, and the Stern humor ship has sailed
years ago. Of course the scrotum sniffing barge is firmly anchored at port,
so have fun.


 |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Prev: We The People Demand The Release of MLK's FBI Files
Next: When You Need Medication For Panic Attacks