|
Prev: Delay in body growth linked to prostate cancer
Next: What can effect PSA after PCa treatment, besides a recurrence?
From: doug.gosling on 29 Aug 2008 21:37 After the bad news that I posted about earlier, I finally have some good news - at least in the sense that "no bad news" is good news. After finding bone mets, I had an abdominal and pelvic CT Scan to see if there were any visible mets in my soft tissues (lymph nodes, organs). I got the results today and the scan was clear! This is a great relief and gives us some time to breathe while I let the HT work. Thanks again for all your support and good wishes. Doug
From: Steve Kramer on 30 Aug 2008 07:25
<doug.gosling(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:15d91a7c-90fe-4339-a7bb-edd7815f77e0(a)d77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com... > After the bad news that I posted about earlier, I finally have some > good news - at least in the sense that "no bad news" is good news. > After finding bone mets, I had an abdominal and pelvic CT Scan to see > if there were any visible mets in my soft tissues (lymph nodes, > organs). I got the results today and the scan was clear! That IS good news, Doug. I'd say it's a couple of years worth. -- PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46 Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c RRP 12/15/2000 G7 (3+4), T3cN0M0 Neg margins PSA <.1 <.1 <.1 .27 .37 .75 PSAD 0.19 years EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47 PSA .34 .22 .15 .21 .32 PSAD .056 years Lupron 07/03 (1 mo) 8/03 and every 4 months there after PSA .07 .05 .06 .09 .08 .132 .145 PSAD 1.4 years Casodex added daily 07/06 PSA <0.04, <0.05, <0.04, <0.04, <0.1 2/12/08 Illegitimati non carborundum |