From: dh on
On Mon, 11 Aug 2008, Goo wrote:

> If you keep an animal from being born which
> would have been born without your interference,
> you have denied life to it, whether it actually
> exists or not.
> Goo Fuckwit David Harrison - 28 Sept 1999
> http://tinyurl.com/2x3ogu
>
>
>How can you "deny" anything to something that doesn't exist?

That was a mistake in terminology. You certainly
want to prevent billions of lives though, there is no
doubt about that.
From: Dutch on
Rudy Canoza wrote:
> dh@. wrote:
>> On Mon, 11 Aug 2008, Goo wrote:
>>
>>> If you keep an animal from being born which
>>> would have been born without your interference,
>>> you have denied life to it, whether it actually
>>> exists or not.
>>> Goo Fuckwit David Harrison - 28 Sept 1999
>>> http://tinyurl.com/2x3ogu
>>>
>>>
>>> How can you "deny" anything to something that doesn't exist?
>>
>> That was a mistake in terminology.
>
> Ha ha ha ha ha!
>
> Bullshit.

It was indeed a mistake in terminology in that it does
not equivocate, it reveals clearly the underlying
error *in thinking* that Harrison works so hard to
obscure in his more recent posts.