Goo AGAIN outstupids himself by lying.
in [Vegetarian]
|
Prev: Subject: Goo consistently self-outstupided by his own challenge(s).
Next: How About A Side Of Hypocrisy
From: dh on 6 Aug 2008 09:41 On Tue, 05 Aug 2008, Goo lied, and lied, and lied: >On Mon, 04 Aug 2008 20:54:08 -0100, dh@. wrote: > >>On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 23:09:46 GMT, Dutch <no(a)email.com> wrote: >> >>>dh@. wrote: >>>> On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 20:54:06 GMT, Dutch <no(a)email.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Everyone is trying to eliminate those livestock >>>>> animals, most of all meat consumers, who want to eat >>>>> them. ARAs prefer that they never be born. What's >>>>> wrong with that? >>>> >>>> I've been challenging you to explain how it would >>>> be better to eliminate all livestock > >No. No challenge, Goo. You do not, ever, pose a challenge. You could not. It's a challenge that you ALWAYS fail Goober, and always will. You have no argument to support you claims that elimination would be better. >>>As I said, YOU >> >> You have failed again. > >No. He succeeded, again. LOL!!! That's a blatant lie Goob since he didn't even make an attempt, much less did he make an attempt that was in some way successful. You suck at this, Goo. >>The challenge once more has defeated you. > >No challenge, Goo. Goober, first you lied and said there was no challenge, then you lied and said your "Dutch" character had met the challenge and succeeded even though he failed to make any attempt whatsoever, and now you're lying that there was no challenge again. You have outstupided yourself with the blatancy of your own lies AGAIN Goo. .. . . >> From my experience it is ONLY people who are disturbed >>by the fact that humans eat meat--like you--who are unable >>to consider the animals and can only consider their own >>self-centered interests. None of the meat consumers I've >>discussed it with have had any problem considering the >>animals when considering whether or not it's cruel to the >>animals to be raised for food. Only eliminationists refuse to >>consider the animals, when pretending to consider the >>animals. >
From: Dutch on 6 Aug 2008 17:48 dh@. wrote: > On Tue, 05 Aug 2008, Goo lied, and lied, and lied: > >> On Mon, 04 Aug 2008 20:54:08 -0100, dh@. wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 23:09:46 GMT, Dutch <no(a)email.com> wrote: >>> >>>> dh@. wrote: >>>>> On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 20:54:06 GMT, Dutch <no(a)email.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Everyone is trying to eliminate those livestock >>>>>> animals, most of all meat consumers, who want to eat >>>>>> them. ARAs prefer that they never be born. What's >>>>>> wrong with that? >>>>> I've been challenging you to explain how it would >>>>> be better to eliminate all livestock >> No. No challenge, Goo. You do not, ever, pose a challenge. You could not. > > It's a challenge that you ALWAYS fail Goober, and > always will. You have no argument to support you > claims that elimination would be better. That's not his claim or mine, however, better for "who" or "what"?
From: dh on 7 Aug 2008 14:17
On Wed, 06 Aug 2008 21:48:17 GMT, Dutch <no(a)email.com> wrote: >dh@. wrote: >> On Tue, 05 Aug 2008, Goo lied, and lied, and lied: >> >>> On Mon, 04 Aug 2008 20:54:08 -0100, dh@. wrote: >>> >>>> On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 23:09:46 GMT, Dutch <no(a)email.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> dh@. wrote: >>>>>> On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 20:54:06 GMT, Dutch <no(a)email.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Everyone is trying to eliminate those livestock >>>>>>> animals, most of all meat consumers, who want to eat >>>>>>> them. ARAs prefer that they never be born. What's >>>>>>> wrong with that? >>>>>> I've been challenging you to explain how it would >>>>>> be better to eliminate all livestock >>> No. No challenge, Goo. You do not, ever, pose a challenge. You could not. >> >> It's a challenge that you ALWAYS fail Goober, and >> always will. You have no argument to support you >> claims that elimination would be better. > >That's not his claim "no matter how "decent" the conditions are, the deliberate killing of the animals erases all of it." - Goo "you MUST believe that it makes moral sense not to raise the animals as the only way to prevent the harm that results from killing them." - Goo "Humans could change it. They could change it by ending it." - Goo "There is no "selfishness" involved in wanting farm animals not to exist as a step towards creating a more just world." - Goo |