From: Peter B. on

"t" <tools22(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:WPCdnVzt6vEJxEnXnZ2dnUVZ_qydnZ2d(a)giganews.com...
> BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!! Thats rich! One of the most inferior people on
> the planet diagnosing anyone else. So, have you changed your panties
> yet?

You have me mixed up with RPA, besides, no one takes an idio"t"
seriously.

> "Peter B." <info(a)i-brag.com> wrote in message
> news:4ad3d847(a)news.x-privat.org...
>> "t" <tools22(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:HoWdnerWXIcsoE7XnZ2dnUVZ_oydnZ2d(a)giganews.com...
>>> Yes , Mark , he who could not even make it as an attorney, I can
>>> post correctly. But, then net-nanny's would not get their panties
>>> wet. If you had been following my posts, you would find that I have,
>>> on occasion, posted according to your standards. But it's not as
>>> much fun as irritating people like you.
>>
>> Now that is a true sign of someone with a complete inferiority
>> complex.
>>
>> But then you knew that.
>>
>>> "Mark Probert" <mark.probert(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:d3a65591-1f69-45e7-b6d5-35784519e8e8(a)h30g2000vbr.googlegroups.com...
>>> On Oct 12, 7:59 am, "t" <tool...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Back, and still smarter than you.
>>>
>>> BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>>
>>> You do not even know how to post a message without screwing up the
>>> attributions.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "Peter B." <i...(a)i-brag.com> wrote in message
>>>>
>>>> news:4ad27745(a)news.x-privat.org...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> > Back already "t"?
>>>>
>>>> > "t" <tool...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> >news:04ydnZ4dGPgW7k_XnZ2dnUVZ_rOdnZ2d(a)giganews.com...
>>>>
>>>> >> "Mark Probert" <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> >>news:7eb90998-8246-44d2-aa22-fcd2583382db(a)e34g2000vbm.googlegroups.com...
>>>> >> On Oct 11, 1:17 am, Jan Drew <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote:
>>>> >>> On Oct 10, 11:13 am, dr_jeff <u...(a)msu.edu>
>>>>
>>>> >>> Ain't that just too cute.
>>>>
>>>> >>> Jeffrey Peter Joseph Utz, is using yet another email address.
>>>>
>>>> >>> Unlike jeff.utz(a)gmail on the Quack list.
>>>>
>>>> >>> He is a not kidsdoc.
>>>>
>>>> >>> He has failed to provide proof by showinng his current M.D.
>>>> >>> license.
>>>>
>>>> >>> Thus, one cannot believe a word he posts.
>>>>
>>>> >> Jeff earned a Medical Doctor degree, thus making it entirely
>>>> >> proper
>>>> >> for him call himself doctor.
>>>>
>>>> >> You are not bright enough to understand this.>>> So.... we did
>>>> >> not know
>>>> >> thatr you were therte to see him earn a degree. Or that you know
>>>> >> him
>>>> >> personaly and have been to his office. Or that you have anything
>>>> >> to
>>>> >> support your idiotic statement. I think you might have done
>>>> >> better to
>>>> >> review the rules of evedince. AND............ So what if he has
>>>> >> a
>>>> >> "medical doctor degree"? "medical doctors" have been wrong far
>>>> >> too long
>>>> >> on far too many "diseases" while makeing money from people's
>>>> >> problems. A
>>>> >> few are dedicated but even they are poorly educated and
>>>> >> programed to
>>>> >> think in a wrong-headed way. And one more thing, I'M BACK!!!-
>>>> >> Hide quoted text -
>>>>
>>>> - Show quoted text -
>>>
>>
>>
>


From: Jan Drew on
Is over.
From: Jan Drew on
On Oct 13, 1:26�am, Martin <n...(a)nowhere.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 17:44:55 -0700 (PDT), Citizen Jimserac
>
>
>
>
>
> <jimse...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Oct 11, 11:41�am, Martin <n...(a)nowhere.com> wrote:
> >> On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 07:50:53 -0700 (PDT), CitizenJimserac
>
> >> <jimse...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >On Oct 10, 3:59�pm, Peter Bowditch <myfirstn...(a)ratbags.com> wrote:
> >> >> "john" <nos...(a)bt.com> wrote:
> >> >> >Dr Clark passed away, last month.
>
Insults and blatant lies deleted.
>
> >> >> --
>
> >> >Bowditch, I understand your Quixotian crusade, but really, old dude,
> >> >you're really exceeding the bounds of propriety in speaking of her in
> >> >this matter and I must object, irrespective of the merits of Clark's
> >> >methods.
>
> >> I think he's being nice

Sure you do Martin Rady gang member and another atheist.

You've don't enough pissing, as a matter of fact that is all you ever
do.


> >> >I don't know what the hell a "Zapper" is and, right now I don't care -
> >> >someday when time permits I will read some of her writings and see if
> >> >there is some merit.
>
More lies deleted.

>
> >> >I must sternly caution you, Bowditch, that your anti-intellectual and
> >> >anti-scientific emotionalism, and outright hatred of this Clark person
> >> >are plainly obvious and may have corrupted your judgement on the
> >> >merits of her ideas

<snip more lies>
>

She did none of these things. We have a string of blatant liars.


>
> >> > - indicative that the allowance of your good faith
> >> >motivations to help people and protect them against charlatans may
> >> >have a darker side which impairs judgement and leads to pseudo-
> >> >sceptical condemnation, a grave threat to genuine scientific
> >> >researchers and practitioners in all disciplines.

[ ]
>
> >
> >> >It so happens, I AM slowly, when time permits, reading a book by Dr.
> >> >Emmanuel Revici MD, published in the early 1960's. �Revici has been
> >> >reviled, attacked, condemned, criticized and excoriated for his anti-
> >> >cancer protocols and therapies and various articles have, several
> >> >times produced what is, in my opinion, rather shoddy "evidence" that
> >> >they do not work.
>
> >> Revici's method has been thoroughly investigated by a Senate
> >> committee, stacked in favor of alt-med (!), and found it didn't work,
> >> a conclusion based on the fact that he was unable to produce any
> >> patient at all that he cured. Oh, plenty of claims, but none that had
> >> the diagnosis cancer confirmed, were treated only by his method and
> >> were cured. None. I've read the committee's report.
>
> >Ya, there's a lot of reports out there about this - DO YOU HAVE A
> >LINK?
>
> >I'd like to read it.
>
> I read the paper version in the JREF library years ago.
>
> >Maybe we can get Dr. Moran to comment.

Why? To read more lies?
>
> >One other thing on this Clark woman.

She was Dr Hulda Clark, You OTOH are an atheist know nothing.

�You, Bowditch and others make a
> >lot of accusations about her -
> >how about some facts for people like myself who know little or nothing
> >about her.
>
> I've given you the facts: she claims a low level voltage cattleprod
> can cure any and all disease. What more do you need to know?
>
> >Was she ever charged with crimes? �Lawsuits? � Accusations or facts ?
>
> Why the hell do you think she hid in Mexico?

She didn't. That is a repeated lie. She had an address, income tax
returns/forms, and driver's license in Calfornia. That was revealed
at the Nashville trial. when Amy (who was trying to make a name for
her husband) slipped up and backed herself in the corner.
>
>
>
> >Put up.... or shut up. �(Don't bother Hapless Clamhead, you telling us
> >about the Naturopathic mafia
> >is not fact, it's just your delusional conspiracy theory wiping away
> >your thinking).
>
> >Martin - if you've got the goods on her now's the time.
>
> >Citizen Jimserac- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

He doesn't. He just repeats what he has heard from a bunch of blatant
liars.

I knew her, none of you did.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jLA06UmFg0s
From: Peter B. on

"Jan Drew" <jdrew63929(a)aol.com> wrote in message
news:356d0e9f-21af-42c7-9155-115ebfb1b5a9(a)j4g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...
> Is over...

Is in pieces, cannot roll over, bottom of the sea by now.

Probably killed many fishes when they ate what they thought was
sprinkled fish food.

Hope none of the fish survived or the next fish you eat may have some of
her in it.


From: Peter B. on

"Jan Drew" <jdrew63929(a)aol.com> wrote in message
news:3577f3ce-09c5-4e69-b717-ab687f2dc459(a)s31g2000yqs.googlegroups.com...
>
>I knew her, none of you did.
>

Now that is a lie. She lived nowhere near you. You have no proof, and I
doubt you are game enough to show the receipts for the products you
bought from that shill.