From: Happy Oyster on
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 15:49:20 -0500, "t" <tools22(a)gmail.com> wrote:

>
>"Happy Oyster" <happy.oyster(a)ariplex.com> wrote in message
>news:2k27d5lo3fnfhprvambm5klrskh29f7p7n(a)4ax.com...
>> On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:57:16 -0500, "t" <tools22(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm not claiming that it works or not.
>>
>> And now?
> AND NOW! Clam will have the opertunity to back his words up with proof. If
>he can........

YOU make the claims, so YOU will have to make the proofs.
--
Interview mit dem Autor der "Reimbibel"
Kultur und Wissen
Ausl�ser war der Besuch von Benedikt XVI. in Auschwitz-Birkenau
http://www.nrhz.de/flyer/beitrag.php?id=14183
From: t on

"Happy Oyster" <happy.oyster(a)ariplex.com> wrote in message
news:q067d5tbddio24v0ggn5fshq7g8319katd(a)4ax.com...
> On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 15:49:20 -0500, "t" <tools22(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Happy Oyster" <happy.oyster(a)ariplex.com> wrote in message
>>news:2k27d5lo3fnfhprvambm5klrskh29f7p7n(a)4ax.com...
>>> On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:57:16 -0500, "t" <tools22(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'm not claiming that it works or not.
>>>
>>> And now?
>> AND NOW! Clam will have the opertunity to back his words up with proof.
>> If
>>he can........
>
> YOU make the claims, so YOU will have to make the proofs.
Please post a link or something to where I made claims about this.

From: Mark Probert on
On Oct 12, 4:12 pm, dr_jeff <u...(a)msu.edu> wrote:
> t wrote:
>
> > "Happy Oyster" <happy.oys...(a)ariplex.com> wrote in message
> >news:4o17d5du51707uka3kiktmbn3hddshmu5i(a)4ax.com...
> >> On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 10:21:09 -0500, "t" <tool...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>> People like you who make claims about her and provide no proof. Can you
> >>> PROVE that her zapper did nothing?
>
> >> That is the typical idiots' claim.
>
> >> Can you PROVE that her zapper did work? No, you can't. It is as simple
> >> as that.
> > No, O Slow One, I'm not claiming that it works or not. Never used one.
> > BUT, since you and your buds here HAVE made claim that it does not.
> > Therefore, YOU need prove your statement. I know that you won't, but
> > it's worth some humor to see your answers.So, I have made no claim, I
> > need prove nothing.
>
> The FTC has said it does not work and is a rip-off. That's good enough
> for me.

Actually, Hulda and her Henchmen could not provide any proof of her
claims. Then, the FTC shut them down.

From: t on

"Mark Probert" <mark.probert(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:132b6f82-5666-4c60-a7fe-7087c1b60e9b(a)j28g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 12, 4:12 pm, dr_jeff <u...(a)msu.edu> wrote:
> t wrote:
>
> > "Happy Oyster" <happy.oys...(a)ariplex.com> wrote in message
> >news:4o17d5du51707uka3kiktmbn3hddshmu5i(a)4ax.com...
> >> On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 10:21:09 -0500, "t" <tool...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>> People like you who make claims about her and provide no proof. Can
> >>> you
> >>> PROVE that her zapper did nothing?
>
> >> That is the typical idiots' claim.
>
> >> Can you PROVE that her zapper did work? No, you can't. It is as simple
> >> as that.
> > No, O Slow One, I'm not claiming that it works or not. Never used one.
> > BUT, since you and your buds here HAVE made claim that it does not.
> > Therefore, YOU need prove your statement. I know that you won't, but
> > it's worth some humor to see your answers.So, I have made no claim, I
> > need prove nothing.
>
> The FTC has said it does not work and is a rip-off. That's good enough
> for me.

Actually, You have not proved up your assertion. That makes you a prime
internet boob. Not a person to be trusted. But then you have known that for
a long time..

From: Peter B. on
"t" <tools22(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:HoWdnerWXIcsoE7XnZ2dnUVZ_oydnZ2d(a)giganews.com...
> Yes , Mark , he who could not even make it as an attorney, I can post
> correctly. But, then net-nanny's would not get their panties wet. If
> you had been following my posts, you would find that I have, on
> occasion, posted according to your standards. But it's not as much fun
> as irritating people like you.

Now that is a true sign of someone with a complete inferiority complex.

But then you knew that.

> "Mark Probert" <mark.probert(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:d3a65591-1f69-45e7-b6d5-35784519e8e8(a)h30g2000vbr.googlegroups.com...
> On Oct 12, 7:59 am, "t" <tool...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> Back, and still smarter than you.
>
> BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>
> You do not even know how to post a message without screwing up the
> attributions.
>
>
>
> "Peter B." <i...(a)i-brag.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:4ad27745(a)news.x-privat.org...
>>
>>
>>
>> > Back already "t"?
>>
>> > "t" <tool...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>> >news:04ydnZ4dGPgW7k_XnZ2dnUVZ_rOdnZ2d(a)giganews.com...
>>
>> >> "Mark Probert" <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>> >>news:7eb90998-8246-44d2-aa22-fcd2583382db(a)e34g2000vbm.googlegroups.com...
>> >> On Oct 11, 1:17 am, Jan Drew <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote:
>> >>> On Oct 10, 11:13 am, dr_jeff <u...(a)msu.edu>
>>
>> >>> Ain't that just too cute.
>>
>> >>> Jeffrey Peter Joseph Utz, is using yet another email address.
>>
>> >>> Unlike jeff.utz(a)gmail on the Quack list.
>>
>> >>> He is a not kidsdoc.
>>
>> >>> He has failed to provide proof by showinng his current M.D.
>> >>> license.
>>
>> >>> Thus, one cannot believe a word he posts.
>>
>> >> Jeff earned a Medical Doctor degree, thus making it entirely
>> >> proper
>> >> for him call himself doctor.
>>
>> >> You are not bright enough to understand this.>>> So.... we did not
>> >> know
>> >> thatr you were therte to see him earn a degree. Or that you know
>> >> him
>> >> personaly and have been to his office. Or that you have anything
>> >> to
>> >> support your idiotic statement. I think you might have done better
>> >> to
>> >> review the rules of evedince. AND............ So what if he has a
>> >> "medical doctor degree"? "medical doctors" have been wrong far too
>> >> long
>> >> on far too many "diseases" while makeing money from people's
>> >> problems. A
>> >> few are dedicated but even they are poorly educated and programed
>> >> to
>> >> think in a wrong-headed way. And one more thing, I'M BACK!!!- Hide
>> >> quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>