From: t on

"Happy Oyster" <happy.oyster(a)ariplex.com> wrote in message
news:4o17d5du51707uka3kiktmbn3hddshmu5i(a)4ax.com...
> On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 10:21:09 -0500, "t" <tools22(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> People like you who make claims about her and provide no proof. Can you
>>PROVE that her zapper did nothing?
>
> That is the typical idiots' claim.
>
> Can you PROVE that her zapper did work? No, you can't. It is as simple as
> that.
No, O Slow One, I'm not claiming that it works or not. Never used one. BUT,
since you and your buds here HAVE made claim that it does not. Therefore,
YOU need prove your statement. I know that you won't, but it's worth some
humor to see your answers.So, I have made no claim, I need prove nothing.

From: Happy Oyster on
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:57:16 -0500, "t" <tools22(a)gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm not claiming that it works or not.

And now?
--
Interview mit dem Autor der "Reimbibel"
Kultur und Wissen
Ausl´┐Żser war der Besuch von Benedikt XVI. in Auschwitz-Birkenau
http://www.nrhz.de/flyer/beitrag.php?id=14183
From: dr_jeff on
t wrote:
>
> "Happy Oyster" <happy.oyster(a)ariplex.com> wrote in message
> news:4o17d5du51707uka3kiktmbn3hddshmu5i(a)4ax.com...
>> On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 10:21:09 -0500, "t" <tools22(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> People like you who make claims about her and provide no proof. Can you
>>> PROVE that her zapper did nothing?
>>
>> That is the typical idiots' claim.
>>
>> Can you PROVE that her zapper did work? No, you can't. It is as simple
>> as that.
> No, O Slow One, I'm not claiming that it works or not. Never used one.
> BUT, since you and your buds here HAVE made claim that it does not.
> Therefore, YOU need prove your statement. I know that you won't, but
> it's worth some humor to see your answers.So, I have made no claim, I
> need prove nothing.

The FTC has said it does not work and is a rip-off. That's good enough
for me.

Jeff
From: t on

"dr_jeff" <utz(a)msu.edu> wrote in message
news:DMKdne7kL8QHEE7XnZ2dnUVZ_sKdnZ2d(a)giganews.com...
>t wrote:
>>
>> "Happy Oyster" <happy.oyster(a)ariplex.com> wrote in message
>> news:4o17d5du51707uka3kiktmbn3hddshmu5i(a)4ax.com...
>>> On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 10:21:09 -0500, "t" <tools22(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> People like you who make claims about her and provide no proof. Can you
>>>> PROVE that her zapper did nothing?
>>>
>>> That is the typical idiots' claim.
>>>
>>> Can you PROVE that her zapper did work? No, you can't. It is as simple
>>> as that.
>> No, O Slow One, I'm not claiming that it works or not. Never used one.
>> BUT, since you and your buds here HAVE made claim that it does not.
>> Therefore, YOU need prove your statement. I know that you won't, but it's
>> worth some humor to see your answers.So, I have made no claim, I need
>> prove nothing.
>
> The FTC has said it does not work and is a rip-off. That's good enough for
> me.
>
Yeppers! That's good enough for you. Be sure to thank them for all the
after the harm recalls too. It's not good enough.

From: t on

"Happy Oyster" <happy.oyster(a)ariplex.com> wrote in message
news:2k27d5lo3fnfhprvambm5klrskh29f7p7n(a)4ax.com...
> On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:57:16 -0500, "t" <tools22(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I'm not claiming that it works or not.
>
> And now?
AND NOW! Clam will have the opertunity to back his words up with proof. If
he can........