From: Peter Bowditch on
Jan Drew <jdrew63929(a)aol.com> wrote:

>On Oct 11, 12:44?pm, Happy Oyster <happy.oys...(a)ariplex.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 17:35:49 +0100, "john" <nos...(a)bt.com> wrote:
>> >You and truth are complete strangers
>>
>> So, here is truth.
>
>Yes, John posted the truth and he did it without 700 lines.
>
>Unlike you, Rodnay
>

Who is this Rodnay? Does he post here?

--
Peter Bowditch aa #2243
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com
From: Peter Bowditch on
Bob Officer <bobofficers(a)127.0.0.7> wrote:

>On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 22:28:14 -0700 (PDT), in misc.health.alternative,
>Jan Drew <jdrew63929(a)aol.com> wrote:
>
>>On Oct 10, 4:03?pm, dr_jeff <u...(a)msu.edu>
>>
>>Is a well known and proven liar. Plus *Gang* member, who was so rude
>>he posted
>>On Dr Hulda Clarks's memorial page.
>
>I do not think he said anything there that he wouldn't say to her
>face.

I was saying it before she died, so why would her death change
anything?

>
>>It does not get any lower that that.
>
>How low is it to say good things about a known indifferent killer of
>ill people living or dead.

--
Peter Bowditch aa #2243
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com
From: Peter Bowditch on
Jan Drew <jdrew63929(a)aol.com> wrote:

>On Oct 11, 12:41?pm, Happy Oyster <happy.oys...(a)ariplex.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 16:03:01 +0100, "john" <nos...(a)bt.com> wrote:
>> >Bit late
>
>No, John posted.
>
>Bit late for that but good sentiments http://www.whale.to/a/bowditch.html
>>

And as I said at the time (and the time before, and the time before,
and ...) - I appreciate John posting this link because I find it so
amusing.

--
Peter Bowditch aa #2243
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com
From: t on
Back, and still smarter than you.
"Peter B." <info(a)i-brag.com> wrote in message
news:4ad27745(a)news.x-privat.org...
> Back already "t"?
>
> "t" <tools22(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:04ydnZ4dGPgW7k_XnZ2dnUVZ_rOdnZ2d(a)giganews.com...
>>
>> "Mark Probert" <mark.probert(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:7eb90998-8246-44d2-aa22-fcd2583382db(a)e34g2000vbm.googlegroups.com...
>> On Oct 11, 1:17 am, Jan Drew <jdrew63...(a)aol.com> wrote:
>>> On Oct 10, 11:13 am, dr_jeff <u...(a)msu.edu>
>>>
>>> Ain't that just too cute.
>>>
>>> Jeffrey Peter Joseph Utz, is using yet another email address.
>>>
>>> Unlike jeff.utz(a)gmail on the Quack list.
>>>
>>> He is a not kidsdoc.
>>>
>>> He has failed to provide proof by showinng his current M.D. license.
>>>
>>> Thus, one cannot believe a word he posts.
>>
>> Jeff earned a Medical Doctor degree, thus making it entirely proper
>> for him call himself doctor.
>>
>> You are not bright enough to understand this.>>> So.... we did not know
>> thatr you were therte to see him earn a degree. Or that you know him
>> personaly and have been to his office. Or that you have anything to
>> support your idiotic statement. I think you might have done better to
>> review the rules of evedince. AND............ So what if he has a
>> "medical doctor degree"? "medical doctors" have been wrong far too long
>> on far too many "diseases" while makeing money from people's problems. A
>> few are dedicated but even they are poorly educated and programed to
>> think in a wrong-headed way. And one more thing, I'M BACK!!!
>>
>
>

From: t on

"Bob Officer" <bobofficers(a)127.0.0.7> wrote in message
news:0825d5l910jl5k6auodj8fd7iehqb70r36(a)4ax.com...
> On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 17:35:49 +0100, in misc.health.alternative,
> "john" <nospam(a)bt.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"dr_jeff" <utz(a)msu.edu> wrote in message
>>> We owe the dead nothing but the truth. I provided it. If you don't like
>>> it, that tells me I did the right thing.
>>>
>>> Jeff
>>
>>LOL. You and truth are complete strangers
>>
>
You subscribe to the lie that Clark caused harm to people? Post proof .
>
>
>