Prev: Reposting Was: Re: Anniversary of the rest of my life
Next: Wasabi versus canker sores in mouth?
From: "Malcolm "Mal" Reynolds" on 7 Aug 2008 14:12
Keith P Walsh <keith.p.walsh(a)btinternet.com> wrote in news:e6eb5ac3-72c8-
4859-b571-2a78134cf144(a)c58g2000hsc.googlegroups.com:

> For a long time now* it has been perfectly intelligent, rational and
> scientific to pose the question, "Would it be possible for the thought
> processes of individuals to be influenced by electromagnetic signals
> engineered by others?"
>
> It is my belief that any intelligent, rational and scientific answer
> to this question would have to be based on experimental evidence.
>
> Can anyone offer any intelligent, rational and scientific explanation
> as to why no such answer appears to have been established?

Because it doesn't involve amalgams?



>
> Keith P Walsh
>
> * I'd say at least 75 years.

 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Reposting Was: Re: Anniversary of the rest of my life
Next: Wasabi versus canker sores in mouth?