From: Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD on
ad...(a)ng2000.com wrote:
>
> http://www.ng2000.com/fw.php?tp=diabetes
>
> A CHARITY claims hundreds of people in Hartlepool and east Durham have diabetes that has not been diagnosed

Diagnosing type-2 diabetes/pre-diabetes/MetS in everyone who has it
would bankrupt all existing health insurance agencies whether
governmental or private.

Thus, it remains smarter for everyone to eat less, down to the right
amount, in order to lose the VAT that causes this condition.

<><

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/3558812d72ab4e17?
From: anonymous on
> A CHARITY claims hundreds of people in Hartlepool and east Durham have
diabet
es that has not been diagnosed

"Diagnosing type-2 diabetes/pre-diabetes/MetS in everyone who has it
would bankrupt all existing health insurance agencies whether
governmental or private.

Thus, it remains smarter for everyone to eat less, down to the right
amount, in order to lose the VAT that causes this condition."

Flawed logiccally, it first must be identified which is a minor cost.
Not spending a small amount will result in more expenditure later with
the complications.

Vat is normal, all have it including the poster. It is not the cause of
diabetes. To say so is to suggest that sun rises cause sunburns.

Exercise reduces excess vat before other fat stores and before weight
loss is significant. To suggest a calorie restriction diet is fine but
a good clinition would address the full plan of treatment that will have
more effective outcomes.
From: Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD on
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/0ad49f78d54cdd4e?

<><

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/3558812d72ab4e17?