Prev: rupie continues to whiff off - over three weeks now
Next: SEEING THE FACE OF GOD
From: dh on 19 Aug 2008 12:16
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008, Goo wrote:

>dh asked:
>
>> On Sun, 17 Aug 2008 14:00:51 -0700 (PDT), Wanda Tinasky <wandatinasky(a)comcast.net> wrote:
.. . .
>>>>> the last element before the text "not-for-mail" is 6f2e25e0. That is
>>>>> Goo Fuckwit David Harrison's unique posting ID with BellSouth. It is
>>>>> the same in the "Dutch" forgery as in all of Goo Fuckwit David
>>>>> Harrison's other shitty posts. "
>>> Nice to see you admitting you're a liar;
>>
>> LOL! How did you just happen across that?
>
>You have never even heard of Martin Heidegger.

She's trying to equate the experiment I made on you/"Dutch"/"Derek"
which involved a slight degree of dishonesty, with Howard Levey's lifetime
of lying and his attempts to get millions/billions of people damned to Hell
if there is one, Goo.

How do you think she just happened across the experimental post
in a news group she never participates in, Goo? The mystery will most
likely never be explained, meaning we will be left to guess for ourselves.
From: Rupert on 19 Aug 2008 21:03
On Aug 20, 12:16 am, dh@. wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Aug 2008, Goo wrote:
> >dh asked:
>
> >> On Sun, 17 Aug 2008 14:00:51 -0700 (PDT), Wanda Tinasky <wandatina...(a)comcast.net> wrote:
> . . .
> >>>>> the last element before the text "not-for-mail" is 6f2e25e0. That is
> >>>>> Goo Fuckwit David Harrison's unique posting ID with BellSouth. It is
> >>>>> the same in the "Dutch" forgery as in all of Goo Fuckwit David
> >>>>> Harrison's other shitty posts. "
> >>> Nice to see you admitting you're a liar;
>
> >> LOL! How did you just happen across that?
>
> >You have never even heard of Martin Heidegger.
>
> She's trying to equate the experiment I made on you/"Dutch"/"Derek"
> which involved a slight degree of dishonesty, with Howard Levey's lifetime
> of lying and his attempts to get millions/billions of people damned to Hell
> if there is one, Goo.
>
> How do you think she just happened across the experimental post
> in a news group she never participates in, Goo? The mystery will most
> likely never be explained, meaning we will be left to guess for ourselves.

Most likely she was stalking you via your Google Groups profile.
From: dh on 20 Aug 2008 12:27
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008, Goo lied:

>On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 15:16:03 -0100, dh@. wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 18 Aug 2008, Goo wrote:
>>
>>>dh asked:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 17 Aug 2008 14:00:51 -0700 (PDT), Wanda Tinasky <wandatinasky(a)comcast.net> wrote:
>>. . .
>>>>>>> the last element before the text "not-for-mail" is 6f2e25e0. That is
>>>>>>> Goo Fuckwit David Harrison's unique posting ID with BellSouth. It is
>>>>>>> the same in the "Dutch" forgery as in all of Goo Fuckwit David
>>>>>>> Harrison's other shitty posts. "
>>>>> Nice to see you admitting you're a liar;
>>>>
>>>> LOL! How did you just happen across that?
>>>
>>>You have never even heard of Martin Heidegger.
>>
>> She's trying to equate the experiment I made on you/"Dutch"/"Derek"
>>which involved a slight degree of dishonesty, with Howard Levey's lifetime
>>of lying and his attempts to get millions/billions of people damned to Hell
>>if there is one, Goo.
>
>You did no experiment

In contrast to that lie: You're bitching about the experiment I did.

>> How do you think she just happened across the experimental post
>>in a news group she never participates in, Goo? The mystery will most
>>likely never be explained, meaning we will be left to guess for ourselves.

From: dh on 20 Aug 2008 12:27
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 18:03:07 -0700 (PDT), Rupert <rupertmccallum(a)yahoo.com> wrote:

>On Aug 20, 12:16 am, dh@. wrote:
>> On Mon, 18 Aug 2008, Goo wrote:
>> >dh asked:
>>
>> >> On Sun, 17 Aug 2008 14:00:51 -0700 (PDT), Wanda Tinasky <wandatina...(a)comcast.net> wrote:
>> . . .
>> >>>>> the last element before the text "not-for-mail" is 6f2e25e0. That is
>> >>>>> Goo Fuckwit David Harrison's unique posting ID with BellSouth. It is
>> >>>>> the same in the "Dutch" forgery as in all of Goo Fuckwit David
>> >>>>> Harrison's other shitty posts. "
>> >>> Nice to see you admitting you're a liar;
>>
>> >> LOL! How did you just happen across that?
>>
>> >You have never even heard of Martin Heidegger.
>>
>> She's trying to equate the experiment I made on you/"Dutch"/"Derek"
>> which involved a slight degree of dishonesty, with Howard Levey's lifetime
>> of lying and his attempts to get millions/billions of people damned to Hell
>> if there is one, Goo.
>>
>> How do you think she just happened across the experimental post
>> in a news group she never participates in, Goo? The mystery will most
>> likely never be explained, meaning we will be left to guess for ourselves.
>
>Most likely she was stalking you via your Google Groups profile.

That sounds like a good guess, I guess. Why she would do it is a
better question...I guess. I've been pointing out that since she can't
realistically consider the possibility of God's existence she is a strong
atheist, and not a weak one. For some seemingly absurd reason she
acts like she wants to consider herself a weak atheist instead of a
strong one, even though she can't consider the possibility of God's
existence realistically. Why??? Why does she want to pretend she's
something she for one thing quite obviously is not, and for another
she ridicules people for being, which is someone who considers the
possibility of God's existence?

These strong atheist types have turned out to be a surprisingly
strange group of people. They are ashamed of their own faith. They
ridicule others for considering the possibility of God's existence
showing that they themselves have faith that he does not exist, yet
they nearly always are ashamed of their faith and try to deny it. That
in itself is absurd enough, but when pressed on the matter it usually
turns out that they want to deny their faith in everything they have
faith in, including that the Earth will continue to rotate, and orbit the
sun, etc...
From: Wanda Tinasky on 21 Aug 2008 00:01
On Aug 19, 6:03 pm, Rupert <rupertmccal...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Aug 20, 12:16 am, dh@. wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Mon, 18 Aug 2008, Goo wrote:
> > >dh asked:
>
> > >> On Sun, 17 Aug 2008 14:00:51 -0700 (PDT), Wanda Tinasky <wandatina....(a)comcast.net> wrote:
> > . . .
> > >>>>> the last element before the text "not-for-mail" is 6f2e25e0.  That is
> > >>>>> Goo Fuckwit David Harrison's unique posting ID with BellSouth.  It is
> > >>>>> the same in the "Dutch" forgery as in all of Goo Fuckwit David
> > >>>>> Harrison's other shitty posts. "
> > >>> Nice to see you admitting you're a liar;
>
> > >>     LOL! How did you just happen across that?
>
> > >You have never even heard of Martin Heidegger.
>
> >     She's trying to equate the experiment I made on you/"Dutch"/"Derek"
> > which involved a slight degree of dishonesty, with Howard Levey's lifetime
> > of lying and his attempts to get millions/billions of people damned to Hell
> > if there is one, Goo.
>
> >     How do you think she just happened across the experimental post
> > in a news group she never participates in, Goo? The mystery will most
> > likely never be explained, meaning we will be left to guess for ourselves.
>
> Most likely she was stalking you via your Google Groups profile.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Bingo. Took ~ 30 seconds.

Luv,

Wanda
 |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2
Prev: rupie continues to whiff off - over three weeks now
Next: SEEING THE FACE OF GOD