|
From: Anon on 19 Nov 2008 14:51 So long as peoples worship diverse gods, and each worshipper claims his/her own god to be the one and only god, those who worship none of them are well out of those foolish disputes over whose "god" is "God".
From: Anon on 19 Nov 2008 14:52 So long as peoples worship diverse gods, and each worshipper claims his/her own god to be the one and only god, those who worship none of them are well out of those foolish disputes over whose "god" is "God".
From: Gary Woods on 19 Nov 2008 15:07 <sneck> Anon <hate30(a)the.lie.com> wrote: >So long as peoples worship diverse gods, and each worshipper claims >his/her own god to be the one and only god, those who worship none of >them are well out of those foolish disputes over whose "god" is "God". And those who worship one or two gods with many faces and respect others freedom to worship (or not) just sit to one side looking vaguely puzzled at all of the above... Gary Woods AKA K2AHC- PGP key on request, or at home.earthlink.net/~garygarlic Zone 5/6 in upstate New York, 1420' elevation. NY WO G
From: john McCoy on 20 Nov 2008 01:36 Anon wrote: > So long as peoples worship diverse gods, and each worshipper claims > his/her own god to be the one and only god, those who worship none of > them are well out of those foolish disputes over whose "god" is "God". Mine is better. John
|
Pages: 1 Prev: Study puts a total on diabetes cost: $218 billion Next: Leads, leads and more leads FREE! |