From: Mark Probert on
Remeber Desire Jennings? You know...the cheerleader who claims to have
developed Dystonia as the result of a flu shot? The one who the anti-
vax liars were bleating and braying over to "prove" flu shots are
dangerous?

Some said she had psychogenic Dystonia, IOW, it was all in her mind.

HOWEVER...it is now documented that it was all in her empty wallet:

So now she speaks with an Aussie accent and is stricken with camera-
induced dystonia. It must be inconvenient to be stranded in the mall
parking lot having just encountered a camera:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kpe1u4cKbTk


From: Peter B on

"Mark Probert" <mark.probert(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:f0da3429-0038-4947-93ad-cb191eeea577(a)c16g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
> Remeber Desire Jennings? You know...the cheerleader who claims to have
> developed Dystonia as the result of a flu shot? The one who the anti-
> vax liars were bleating and braying over to "prove" flu shots are
> dangerous?
>
> Some said she had psychogenic Dystonia, IOW, it was all in her mind.
>
> HOWEVER...it is now documented that it was all in her empty wallet:
>
> So now she speaks with an Aussie accent and is stricken with camera-
> induced dystonia. It must be inconvenient to be stranded in the mall
> parking lot having just encountered a camera:
>
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kpe1u4cKbTk
>
>

Everyone recognizes homopathetics as gullible suckers.
Where else can you scam someone and have an excuse for why it works for
some and not others?
This one just goes to show us that most are just mentally deficient and
still want in on the scam.


From: Mark Probert on
On Feb 26, 1:47 pm, "Peter B" <origin...(a)frag.com> wrote:
> "Mark Probert" <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:f0da3429-0038-4947-93ad-cb191eeea577(a)c16g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> > Remeber Desire Jennings? You know...the cheerleader who claims to have
> > developed Dystonia as the result of a flu shot? The one who the anti-
> > vax liars were bleating and braying over to "prove" flu shots are
> > dangerous?
>
> > Some said she had psychogenic Dystonia, IOW, it was all in her mind.
>
> > HOWEVER...it is now documented that it was all in her empty wallet:
>
> > So now she speaks with an Aussie accent and is stricken with camera-
> > induced dystonia.  It must be inconvenient to be stranded in the mall
> > parking lot having just encountered a camera:
>
> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kpe1u4cKbTk
>
> Everyone recognizes homopathetics as gullible suckers.
> Where else can you scam someone and have an excuse for why it works for
> some and not others?
> This one just goes to show us that most are just mentally deficient and
> still want in on the scam.-

This is about her faking a disorder to further an as yet unannounced
agenda. I see surveillance videos of "miracles" all the time, and this
one is classic.

Unfortunately, due to lack of contemporaneous time stamping, etc. it
is not of evidentiary quality for prosecution. We time stamp using the
video camera and take video of a networked cell phone where the time
is set by the network, not the phone's owner.



From: Jan Drew on
On Feb 26, 12:59�pm, Mark Probert <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Remeber Desire Jennings? You know...the cheerleader who claims to have
> developed Dystonia as the result of a flu shot? The one who the anti-
> vax liars were bleating and braying over to "prove" flu shots are
> dangerous?
>
> Some said she had psychogenic Dystonia, IOW, it was all in her mind.
>
> HOWEVER...it is now documented that it was all in her empty wallet:
>
> So now she speaks with an Aussie accent and is stricken with camera-
> induced dystonia. �It must be inconvenient to be stranded in the mall
> parking lot having just encountered a camera:
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kpe1u4cKbTk

That's funny???

Remember when you called it you BOOB??

From: Mark Probert <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 18:39:37 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, Jun 16 2009 8:39 pm
Subject: Re: Vaccine Damage Class Action Lawsuit

On Jun 16, 9:05 pm, "Jan Drew" <jdrew1...(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote:



- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

> "Happy Oyster" <happy.oys...(a)ariplex.com> wrote in message

> news:taaf35tvsgs1jg8504chlgfu8nkhoqerko(a)4ax.com...


> > On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 23:21:30 -0400, "Jan Drew" <jdrew1...(a)sbcglobal.net>
> > wrote:


> >>"Mark Probert" <mark.prob...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
> >>news:1730f218-fa04-4d29-9c41-9e59da2295cb(a)m19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com....
> >>On Jun 15, 9:41 pm, KevysMom <kevys...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> Developing a case to show common symptoms after vaccine damage.


> >>> Courts ruled in favor of vaccine injury child.


> >>>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g5Yp_uVnbEQ


> >>> Classic signs of what to look for in vaccine injury.


> >>Dr. Andrew Moulden is so far out of this universe that even the most
> >>rabid anti-vax zealots have rejected him This guy is crazy.


> >>Of course, Donna, that is the best that the anti-vacs can do.


> >>Dr. Moulden has been appointed to the Scientific Advisory Board for the
> >>First Annual World Congress on Vaccinology in Guangzhou, China, December
> >>1-
> >>5, 2008, where, he is to present to a group of 10,000 experts from around
> >>the world.


> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fGYJeI_5lEM


> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X4l4WyQuKhY&feature=related


> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MPOPRnYjF0s&feature=related


> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vimn2_PO2GU&feature=related


> > That is the usual unreadable junk which Jan Drew dumps into the the net..


> Poor, yappy. People do not read you tube, they listen and watch.-



It is you BOOB.

From: Happy Oyster on
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 17:31:35 -0800 (PST), Jan Drew <jdrew63929(a)aol.com> wrote:

[...]
>Remember when you called it you BOOB??
[...]
>It is you BOOB.

Jan Drew is a racist and a sexist. Her pastor will be delighted...


An amusing incident happened in 2009, when a person, who had shot more than
60,000 postings into the net, demonstrated, that she even is too stupid to count
to 2.


On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 23:11:53 -0400, "Jan Drew" <jdrew1374(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
>[person who is stalked by Jan Drew for years] wrote in message
>news:e5d4c9a4-edb6-429e-a95f-9b7fef936df5(a)y17g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
>On Jul 9, 8:51 pm, "Jan Drew" <jdrew1...(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>> "Jan Drew" <jdrew1...(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
>>
>> news:rzd5m.6677$kA.770(a)nlpi068.nbdc.sbc.com...
>>
>>
>>
>> > Posted that Noah his son's birthday was 11/26/96 (my birthday).
>>
>> > He has numerous posts that are [person who is stalked by Jan Drew for years]
>>
>> > 2009- 1946 = 64 -in November. My math is not wrong.
>>
>> > Thus, [person who is stalked by Jan Drew for years] is a liar.
>
>Since November 2009 is in the future, I will not be 63 until then.
>
>You are amazingly stupid.
>
>November 26th 2009 is in 2009.
>2009-1946 YOU will be 64, not 63. You are 63 now. On November 26, 2009 you
>will be 64.
>Period.
>
>Thanks for proving you are a liar again.
>And, I am correct. You and you alone posted your birthday.


To make things a bit easier to see, this is a table of events.

A person born on 26.11. 1946 is on

26.11.1946 born
26.11.1947 1 year old
26.11.1948 2 years old
26.11.1949 3 years old
26.11.1950 4 years old
26.11.1951 5 years old
26.11.1952 6 years old
26.11.1953 7 years old
26.11.1954 8 years old
26.11.1955 9 years old
26.11.1956 10 years old
26.11.1957 11 years old
26.11.1958 12 years old
26.11.1959 13 years old
26.11.1960 14 years old
26.11.1961 15 years old
26.11.1962 16 years old
26.11.1963 17 years old
26.11.1964 18 years old
26.11.1965 19 years old
26.11.1966 20 years old
26.11.1967 21 years old
26.11.1968 22 years old
26.11.1969 23 years old
26.11.1970 24 years old
26.11.1971 25 years old
26.11.1972 26 years old
26.11.1973 27 years old
26.11.1974 28 years old
26.11.1975 29 years old
26.11.1976 30 years old
26.11.1977 31 years old
26.11.1978 32 years old
26.11.1979 33 years old
26.11.1980 34 years old
26.11.1981 35 years old
26.11.1982 36 years old
26.11.1983 37 years old
26.11.1984 38 years old
26.11.1985 39 years old
26.11.1986 40 years old
26.11.1987 41 years old
26.11.1988 42 years old
26.11.1989 43 years old
26.11.1990 44 years old
26.11.1991 45 years old
26.11.1992 46 years old
26.11.1993 47 years old
26.11.1994 48 years old
26.11.1995 49 years old
26.11.1996 50 years old
26.11.1997 51 years old
26.11.1998 52 years old
26.11.1999 53 years old
26.11.2000 54 years old
26.11.2001 55 years old
26.11.2002 56 years old
26.11.2003 57 years old
26.11.2004 58 years old
26.11.2005 59 years old
26.11.2006 60 years old
26.11.2007 61 years old
26.11.2008 62 years old
26.11.2009 63 years old
************************
26.11.2010 64 years old


On the 26.11. 2009 that person WILL BECOME 63 years old!
********************************************************

But, see above, Jan Drew still insists:

>2009-1946 = 63. On oivember 26 of this year he will be 64.


Now, a person born on 26.11. 1946 is on the very day "26.11.1946" BORN.

1 year later it will be 1 year old:

26.11.1947 1 year old

According to my timeline at 26.11.2009 it will be 63 years old.

But Jan Drew insists on

On oivember 26 of this year he will be 64.


Strange, isn't it?


..
--
Die volle H�rte: http://www.kindersprechstunde.at
***************************************************************
Die Medienmafia � Die Regividerm-Verschw�rung
http://www.transgallaxys.com/~kanzlerzwo/showtopic.php?threadid=5710