From: Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD on
Ellen K. wrote:
>
> http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703545604575407201305888876.html?mod=WSJ_hps_sections_opinion
>
> The article takes a skeptical view.

As should anyone else familiar with the first law of thermodynamics.

Smarter to hold ourselves to the right daily amount (32 oz ) of food.

Yes, right amount (omer) control as Chris Malcolm is doing is much
more sophisticated and smarter:

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.diet.low-carb/msg/8d2ef74488074acf?

Be hungrier, which really is healthier especially for diabetics and
other heart disease patients:

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/9642aafa0aad16eb?

We do this by weighing our meals per the http://WDJW.net/2PD-OMER
Approach to get our...

http://WDJW.net/Status

and then...

http://WDJW.net/Update

so that there will be...

http://WDJW.net/NoVAT

Being hungry is truly wonderful as proven by four lines of evidence:

Mathematical:

http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=31113247&l=9583a55b45&id=1467768946

Historical:

http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=31113078&l=0071d60632&id=1467768946

Medical:

http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=31107542&l=a51ee83a50&id=1467768946

Psychological:

http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=31229810&l=0b3a2ad60b&id=1467768946

So that we really should http://WDJW.net/BeHungry and say we are
"wonderfully hungry" whenever we are greeted:

http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=31113612&l=cbe72c46ca&id=1467768946

There is pure joy in being used by GOD to convince others:

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/8824c8a5b7c7518c?

"A 2005 visit to an Atlanta cardiologist by the name of Andrew Chung
put me on some serious reality

I wasnt just chubby or husky, I am what they often call morbidly
obese. He explained that morbid obesity simply means that if something
happened to me that could be attiributed to weight and I were to end
up in the not breathing state

ok some call it DEAD

that a doctor could simply dismiss it as natural causes related to
weight more or less.

Ive been told I was a chunky fella a couple times, maybe even fat...
but not quite that harshly. Definitely made me think about a few
things, as much as I dislike scare tactics when it comes to health.

Well in the midst of the shock treatment, he also had me come to a
heart wellness seminar that he does on some Saturdays in Mableton.

Nice little get together, he has folks from the community come in and
discuss Tai Chi, exercises, testimonials, all kinds of good stuff.

Then he shows the movie SUPERSIZE ME to set up the pitch for his 2PD
Omer approach that he has his patients use to lose weight.

In a nutshell, in his view, HOW MUCH you eat is more of the issue than
WHAT you eat and portion is more important than any fat content or
calories.

I agree with this. This is why I have always been more successful on
more liquid diets (cabbage soup, slimfast, herbalife (tho dangerous))
than anything else. I wasnt eating the portions I was before that..."

Source:

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/e82824a99ba4f187?

Love in the truth,

Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-certified Cardiologist
and Author of the 2PD-OMER Approach:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/9ad0c19df5ffc2f7?
From: Joseph H. on
Le 2010-08-13 03:11, Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD a �crit :
> Ellen K. wrote:
>>
>> http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703545604575407201305888876.html?mod=WSJ_hps_sections_opinion
>>
>> The article takes a skeptical view.
>
> As should anyone else familiar with the first law of thermodynamics.
>
> Smarter to hold ourselves to the right daily amount (32 oz ) of food.

The diet requirement of a 40-years old, 110 lbs, 5-foot woman is not the
same as the one for a 23-years old, 320 lbs, 6-foot 4 football player.

Chung is not only a quack and a fraud, he's also ignorant and insane.

<snip utter bullshit>
From: Joseph H. on
Le 2010-08-13 17:25, Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD a �crit :
> a sockpuppet wrote:
>> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote :
>>> Ellen K. wrote:
>>>>
>>>> http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703545604575407201305888876.html?mod=WSJ_hps_sections_opinion
>>>>
>>>> The article takes a skeptical view.
>>>
>>> As should anyone else familiar with the first law of thermodynamics.
>>>
>>> Smarter to hold ourselves to the right daily amount (32 oz ) of food.
>>
>> The diet requirement of a 40-years old, 110 lbs, 5-foot woman is not the
>> same as the one for a 23-years old, 320 lbs, 6-foot 4 football player.
>
> Actually, the right daily amount of food is the same for everyone by
> GOD's design according to what is written at Exodus 16:16 with all
> glory to Him.
>
> Those who really need more nutrients will extract more from the food
> they eat on the condition they are eating the right amount (32 oz) per
> day.

You **really** are insane.