300 Million
in [Autism]
|
From: Tim Bruening on 5 Oct 2006 03:08 The U.S. population just reached 300 million!!!!!!!!!
From: dolphinius on 5 Oct 2006 16:28 Tim Bruening wrote: > The U.S. population just reached 300 million!!!!!!!!! That is highly unlikely. Even if births are registered automatically by the doctors there will be some births outside hospitals and it will take some time to register deaths so there will not be an accurate count at any one time. Dolphinius (Male, mid-thirties, UK, self-diagnosed AS)
From: Terry Jones on 5 Oct 2006 18:44 On 5 Oct 2006 13:28:49 -0700, dolphinius(a)fsmail.net wrote: >> The U.S. population just reached 300 million!!!!!!!!! > >That is highly unlikely. Even if births are registered automatically by >the doctors there will be some births outside hospitals and it will >take some time to register deaths so there will not be an accurate >count at any one time. Plus illegals who won't be registered at all. Depending on which statistics you take, they'd need about ten time that to reach the same population density as England (slightly less to match the UK as a whole). -- Terry
From: Terry Jones on 6 Oct 2006 04:32 On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 23:44:36 +0100, Terry Jones <terryjones(a)beeb.net> wrote: >Depending on which statistics you take, they'd need about ten time >that to reach the same population density as England (slightly less to >match the UK as a whole). Just found out that as of the 2001 census, my borough was the second most densely populated in the UK at 118.3 people per hectare (Whatever a hectare is) - apparently Trafalgar square was laid out at one hectare (which is odd, considering that it symbolises victory over the metricators :) Appears to work out at 11,830 per sq km [for European readers, I'm using the UK convention where "," is the thousands separator and "." the decimal separator] and over 30,500 per square mile -- Terry
From: HGJ on 6 Oct 2006 17:19
Terry Jones skrev: > On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 23:44:36 +0100, Terry Jones <terryjones(a)beeb.net> > wrote: > > >Depending on which statistics you take, they'd need about ten time > >that to reach the same population density as England (slightly less to > >match the UK as a whole). > > Just found out that as of the 2001 census, my borough was the second > most densely populated in the UK at 118.3 people per hectare And still there are foxes living there? |