Prev: News - ASTRO
Next: why 18 cores instrad of 12?
From: simonsister on 26 Jan 2008 22:34
Is it? My friend told me that his 19 year old brother has prostate cancer.
I was stunned when I heard it. Can that be possible? Has anyone so young
ever had prostate cancer? Is it worse to have prostate cancer as a young
man? I just can't believe this. Thanks for any info.


From: Alan Meyer on 27 Jan 2008 00:53

"simonsister" <nospam(a)nospam.com> wrote in message
news:479bfbda$0$30718$4c368faf(a)roadrunner.com...
> Is it? My friend told me that his 19 year old brother has prostate
> cancer.
> I was stunned when I heard it. Can that be possible? Has anyone so
> young
> ever had prostate cancer? Is it worse to have prostate cancer as a
> young
> man? I just can't believe this. Thanks for any info.

I have not heard of it - which doesn't prove that it's impossible.

Perhaps your friend is confused about his brother's disease.
There are cancers that strike young people. One of them is
testicular cancer (Lance Armstrong's disease), which is more
common in young people than among the elderly.

Or perhaps his brother has prostatitis - an inflammation or
infection of the prostate, which is not cancer.

Alan


From: Steve Kramer on 27 Jan 2008 07:00


"simonsister" <nospam(a)nospam.com> wrote in message
news:479bfbda$0$30718$4c368faf(a)roadrunner.com...
> Is it? My friend told me that his 19 year old brother has prostate
> cancer.
> I was stunned when I heard it. Can that be possible? Has anyone so young
> ever had prostate cancer? Is it worse to have prostate cancer as a young
> man? I just can't believe this. Thanks for any info.

I am inclined to assert that he does not have prostate cancer. I have seen
over 800 people come through this newsgropu and the youngest was 37 years
old. Only on other was less than 40. Additionally, I have read books,
Internet sites, studies, and attended support group meetings and have never
heard a hint of anyone with this disease less than the later 30s.

Possibilities: Your friend's brother has another cancer and is confused
(justifiably) about it's origin, or mistated it to his sister or she
mistated it to you. Or, he had his blood tested and the lab found a DNA
strain that is currently being called "the marker" for potential development
of prostate cancer. And, of couse, there is always the possibility that
he's pulling your leg.

If he has cancer, any cancer, at 19 years old, it is potentially
devastating. Cancer can simply be described as cells growing our of control
and the younger one is, the more quickly cells naturally grow. I hope he is
pulling your leg.



From: simonsister on 1 Feb 2008 18:30
simonsister wrote:
> Is it? My friend told me that his 19 year old brother has prostate
> cancer. I was stunned when I heard it. Can that be possible? Has
> anyone so young ever had prostate cancer? Is it worse to have
> prostate cancer as a young man? I just can't believe this. Thanks
> for any info.

He doesn't have prostate cancer! I just wanted to thank everyone who
responded. I knew it had to be a mistake. I knew it. Thank you to
everyone. His prostate is just swollen, but it's not cancer and it can be
taken care of. I am so relieved. Thanks again.


From: Heather on 1 Feb 2008 21:25
Glad to hear all is OK with your friend's brother. And thank you for
letting us know the outcome.

Heather

"simonsister" <nospam(a)nospam.com> wrote in message
news:47a3ab6d$0$6509$4c368faf(a)roadrunner.com...
> simonsister wrote:
>> Is it? My friend told me that his 19 year old brother has prostate
>> cancer. I was stunned when I heard it. Can that be possible? Has
>> anyone so young ever had prostate cancer? Is it worse to have
>> prostate cancer as a young man? I just can't believe this. Thanks
>> for any info.
>
> He doesn't have prostate cancer! I just wanted to thank everyone who
> responded. I knew it had to be a mistake. I knew it. Thank you to
> everyone. His prostate is just swollen, but it's not cancer and it
> can be
> taken care of. I am so relieved. Thanks again.
>
>


 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: News - ASTRO
Next: why 18 cores instrad of 12?